Talk:2023 24 Hours of Le Mans/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: EnthusiastWorld37 (talk · contribs) 11:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: DoctorWhoFan91 (talk · contribs) 06:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one, expect initial remarks in the next 24 hours (edit- 48-72 hours). DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 06:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a long article, so I'll give remarks heading by heading. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 09:45, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

three-driver teams: teams of three drivers
Wikilink GT and Protptype like in the 2022 article.
- No, to the racing car type, see the wikilinks for the 2022 edition
  - Done EnthusiastWorld37 (talk) 06:34, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    - No, i meant this ( Le Mans Prototypes (LMP) and [[Le Mans Grand Touring Endurance (LMGTE) cars) User:EnthusiastWorld37, like in the 2022 article?
      - Amended EnthusiastWorld37 (talk) 09:44, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The week before the event, on 4 June, there was a test day.: There was a test day on 4th June, a week before the event.
Their teammates James Calado, Antonio Giovinazzi and Alessandro Pier Guidi won overall after leading the final 55 laps.: Make it clear that there are multiple cars by a single team.

Separate the 3 different categories into 3 different paragraphs- The sea of blue makes it feel confusing, so the team positions will help separate them as well

the Automobile Club de l'Ouest: Add (ACO) after
LMGTE Pro was dropped from the race in 2023, leaving only the Le Mans Grand Touring Endurance Amateur (LMGTE Am) class.: Mention that it's the only class remaining for GT racing, reads confuingly otherwise.

Was their any effect of the teams not consenting to the change
- Umm?
  - I cannot find any information on this specifically EnthusiastWorld37 (talk) 09:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Table 1 and 2 of Hypercar seem to not have any space between them in my browser, needs some

@DoctorWhoFan91: Have made changes to the article based on the above points EnthusiastWorld37 (talk) 14:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@EnthusiastWorld37: Added a reply in the lead section; I'll add comments for the other headings later (semi-busy IRL). DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 06:18, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

with two minutes left.[31][33][34] Toyota's No. 7 : left;[31][33][34] Toyata's No 7; Also split the para after this sentence.

Last sentence: Why did he stop there?
- I am unable to find the exact reason for why he stopped there EnthusiastWorld37 (talk) 09:59, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mention the full name of pole-sitter Nielsen, as there is also a car with that name.
Add 'the' before names of corners and Straights
Add team names and numbers along with driver name, as it gets confusing with groups of three, see last year's article
Read through and do some copy-editing, there were a lot of grammatical errors
Add the hour in which something occurs if it is ambgious, for eg, the lead change in the first para should be mentioned to have occurred in the first hour
Do any other changes you think seem good after reading last year's article.

Reviewing every 15th reference in general

@EnthusiastWorld37: Added replies to two of your replies above; and added review for four more headings(remaining headings: practice, race and post-race). DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 08:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

EnthusiastWorld37, I have performed the spot-check, and am therefore passing the article. Congratulations, it was well-written, and changes and responses were timely. Well done, keep up the good work! DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:23, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·