Talk:2022 Northern Ireland Open/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: HawkAussie (talk · contribs) 03:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I sure pick up this one to add

No issues with the lead there.

...Eurosport in the United Kingdom, Europe, India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka - Wouldn't this make sense to just go the Indian Subcontinent. Or something that mentions it being on Eurosport India like the reference states.
Could remove the Superstar online and the Sports Cast red link like it has been done with the Indonesian channel.

...recovered from 2–3 behind to defeat Graeme Dott 4–3 - Possibly reword that sentence.
Having recently turned 60, Jimmy White made... - Do we need to include he had just turned 60 especially when it only mentioned the age and not how it was recently turn 60.

No issues with this one.

Why use a separate reference for the qualifying when the reference for the main draw would also be sufficient to fill in that void.

sorry for another ping, is there anything else I'd need to look at here HawkAussie? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:40, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Vilenski and HurricaneHiggins, it looks like HawkAussie has only had middling activity on Wikipedia in the last few months. This review is getting quite old, and at this point I'd suggest either setting it to second opinion or relisting it. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:25, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to relist since this was abandoned. Wizardman 02:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]