Jump to content

Talk:2022 Bahamas Bowl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk02:16, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created by PCN02WPS (talk). Self-nominated at 03:51, 28 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @PCN02WPS: Good article. However, I feel as if there needs to be a citation at the sentence "It will be the second Bahamas Bowl appearance for the Blazers after losing the 2017 edition to Ohio by a score of 41–6; the Blazers will join Middle Tennessee and Toledo as the only teans to play in multiple Bahamas Bowls. In addition, this bowl will be UAB's final game as a member of Conference USA before moving to the American Athletic Conference in 2023". Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Approving. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:56, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2022 Bahamas Bowl/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 19:56, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I will take a look at this within the next week. -Riley1012 (talk) 19:56, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Riley1012 Thank you for the review! Comments are below - all of your comments have been dealt with. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 19:52, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick response. I will promote this to GA status. -Riley1012 (talk) 20:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written
The article complies with the manual of style guidelines.
Some prose corrections:

  • "UAB scored a touchdown on their ensuing drive and Miami was unable to respond..." There should be a comma before the word "and"
  • "UAB fell to Liberty in their first road game, but returned..." No comma is needed before the word "but"
  • "...began conference play with a road trip to Rice, but fell by four points." Again, no comma is needed before the word "but"
  • "A road loss at Western Kentucky by a field goal followed, and UAB dropped their next contest at Florida Atlantic by a field goal." This sentence, particularly the first part, feels clunky. It could be changed to something like "UAB then lost consecutive road games against Western Kentucky and Florida Atlantic by a field goal."
  • "They earned a second conference win at Akron to finish October, but dropped their sixth game..." No comma is needed before the word "but"
  • "...Miami won 18–17 in a 4th quarter comeback to achieve bowl eligibility and the Bahamas Bowl bid." This sentence already mentions that the winner of the game would receive the Bahamas Bowl bid, so it feels redundant to repeat it in the same sentence.
  • "They opted to go for it, but were unsuccessful..." No comma is needed before the word "but"
  • "...; they entered the red zone on the next play with a 4-yard pass to the Miami 18-yard-line." This clause should be its own separate sentence
  • "...the first few plays of the second quarter, and faced 2nd & 7 from the Miami 28-yard-line after the next play, but turned the ball over on downs after three consecutive incomplete passes from Hopkins." There shouldn't be a comma both before "and" and "but," but this sentence should be rewritten and split up to not be as long.
  • "...after a sack on second down, and punted on 4th & 6;..." No comma is needed before "and"
  • "The ensuing kickoff resulted in a touchback and UAB took over on the 25-yard-line; two rushes by Brown earned the Blazers a first down and they gained another three plays later with a pass from Hopkins to Fred Farrier II." There need to be commas before both of "and"s, and I would take out the semicolon and make two sentences.
  • "...a half minutes to play and Matt Quinn's extra point bumped..." "...Miami into the red zone and Smith passed to Kenny Tracy..." A comma is needed before "and" in both sentences
  • "..., this put UAB in the lead by four points with 91 seconds on the clock." This part should be a separate sentence

2. Verifiable
Ref layout is good. Earwig Copyvio check is good. No copyright violations found in a check of the sources. No original research.

  • Sources that are now dead urls: 6, 26, 37
  • "They earned a second conference win at Akron to finish October, but dropped their sixth game at home to Ohio following a bye week." This statement is not sourced
  • "Played at Thomas Robinson Stadium in Nassau, Bahamas, the game's weather at kickoff was sunny with a temperature of 81 °F (27 °C)." What is the source for the weather?
    • FN 4: "2022 Bahamas Bowl Final Stats". The weather is the last line printed on p.2: "Temperature: 81 • Wind: 12 north • Weather: sunny"
  • "The game ended at 2:54 p.m., after a total duration of three hours and 18 minutes, with UAB having won 24–20." Source for the time? I believe I saw it in ref. 4, so add that citation here.

3. Broad The article is broad in its coverage

4. Neutral The article is neutral

5. Stable Edit history shows the article is stable

6. Illustrated No pictures included.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.