Talk:2020 California Proposition 22

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Ridesharing company#Ridesharing vs. ridehailing|ride-hail companies]] The anchor (#Ridesharing vs. ridehailing) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Passed

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/04/uber-and-lyft-stock-jump-after-californians-vote-to-pass-prop-22.html

I don't know the exact format to record this though. Hcobb (talk) 15:47, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Balance of viewpoints in Background section

In the background portion of the article, the last 2-3 paragraphs relay Uber's data analysis on the impacts of Prop-22. Given the possibility of bias in the findings, why have these portions not been edited to reflect a more neutral viewpoint highlighting the contentious literature on the subject since the article's creation? --Yd003 (talk) 05:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Civic Technology

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2022 and 30 November 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yd003 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Lolbabycowboy, Adinjoshi1, Zeinaxd.

— Assignment last updated by SkyradBear (talk) 21:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft Bibliography for Prospective Contribution to Article

I plan to rework a bit of the background section of the article - creating a new section to discuss the contested projected effects of the bill, specifically driver earnings, flexibility and benefits, as well as one further discussing interpretation. The bibliography I'm looking to refer to is:

Jacobs, Ken, and Michael Reich. “The Uber/Lyft Ballot Initiative Guarantees Only $5.64 an Hour.” UC Berkeley Labor Center, 21 Apr. 2021, laborcenter.berkeley.edu/the-uber-lyft-ballot-initiative-guarantees-only-5-64-an-hour-2/ .

Thornberg, Christopher. Proposition 22 - Analyzing the Impact on App-Based Drivers’ Earnings. UC Riverside Economic Forecasting and Development, Aug. 2020, https://ucreconomicforecast.org/wp+-+content/uploads/2020/08/Prop22_Driver_Earnings_Analysis_August2020.pdf.

Parrott, James A., and Michael Reich. "An earnings standard for New York City’s app -based drivers." New York: The New School: Center for New York City Affairs (2018)

Wong, Venessa. “Uber, Lyft Drivers in New York Now Earn More than $16 per Trip on Average, According to the City.” BuzzFeed News, 12 June 2019, https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/venessawong/uber-lyft-driver-pay-increase-new-york.

Khosrowshahi, Dara. “The High Cost of Making Drivers Employees.” Uber Newsroom, 5 Oct. 2020, https://www.uber.com/newsroom/economic-impact/.

“CA App-Based Driver Survey.” CA App-Based Driver Survey, June 2020, https://cadriversurveyjge.nationbuilder.com/.

Howard, John. “An Early-Voting Survey of the Ballot Propositions.” Capitol Weekly, 13 Nov. 2020, https://capitolweekly.net/an-early-voting-survey-of-the-ballot-propositions/.

“New Poll Finds Most App Drivers Not Informed and at Risk of Missing Out on Healthcare Benefits Promised Under Prop. 22.” Tulchin Research, 30 Apr. 2021, https://tulchinresearch.com/2021/04/new-poll-finds-most-appdrivers-not-informed-and-at-risk-of-missing Yd003 (talk) 05:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: CALIFORNIA DREAMING, THE GOLDEN STATE'S RHETORICAL APPEALS

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 February 2023 and 24 March 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): PWR2Rideshare (article contribs). Peer reviewers: ConnorGW.

— Assignment last updated by Phrynefisher (talk) 01:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]