Talk:2018 Eritrea–Ethiopia summit

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2018 Eritrea–Ethiopia summit article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

2018 Eritrea–Ethiopia summit was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 16, 2018). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

A news item involving 2018 Eritrea–Ethiopia summit was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 10 July 2018.

Wikipedia

Africa: Eritrea / Ethiopia Mid‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Eritrea portal This article is supported by WikiProject Eritrea (assessed as High-importance).
	Ethiopia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ethiopia (assessed as High-importance).

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: African / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	African military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Algiers Agreement (2000)#Boundary Commission|decision on the boundary]] The anchor (#Boundary Commission) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 03:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

JointDeclaration 2018.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 07:21, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

African Union Flag template

The current flag template used for the AU is for an outdated flag. Isn't there a template for the new (2010) version? Couldn't somebody make one? I would myself, but I' m not such an experienced Wikipedian.

NaplesMetro (talk) 17:00, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2018 Eritrea–Ethiopia summit/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Power~enwiki (talk · contribs) 21:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Notably absent was Debretsion Gebremichael - this sentence is unsourced, and there's no explanation of why this person's absence is notable. "Notably" is on the words to watch list.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	The "Aftermath" section probably could be updated with developments after mid-July. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	There appears to be an outstanding copyright concern regarding some of these photos; there is a deletion discussion at Commons. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

The issues with photo licensing are a hard blocker for approving this. There's also far too much weight on (largely-meaningless) immediate reactions by neutral countries, and not enough weight on the aftermath in Ethiopia and Eritrea. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:48, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No response after almost a week on any issue; the "aftermath" section may need too many updates. Closing as failed. power~enwiki (π, ν) 15:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Abiy Ahmed and Esayas Afeworki.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:07, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Role of UAE and Saudi Arabia in the peace agreement between Ethiopia and Eritrea

The article is silent on the role of UAE and Saudi Arabia in the peace agreement between Ethiopia and Eritrea ?