Talk:2016 PRO Rugby season
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Leading points scorers
[edit]I added a couple of new tables to show the five players with the most tries and most points, similar to the season articles for other professional rugby competitions such as 2015–16_Pro12#Leading_scorers and 2015–16_English_Premiership_(rugby_union)#Leading_scorers. The new tables make it much easier for readers to see the leading players at a glance. I didn't delete the complete table in case other readers find it useful, but given that the complete table is hidden and given how large it is getting, I thought that adding the tables of leading players is useful. So it's somewhat duplicative, but I think it's the best solution. CUA 27 (talk) 00:41, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2016 PRO Rugby season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160422183427/http://www.americasrugbynews.com/2016/04/21/pro-rugby-san-diego-preview/ to http://www.americasrugbynews.com/2016/04/21/pro-rugby-san-diego-preview/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
More about financial problems?
[edit]Obviously the league didn't draw enough interest to stay in operation, but shouldn't more about finances appear in the article? Yes, it seems pretty obvious due to average attendance, and naturally due to the fact that the league was a private business, its records may not be widely available, but more discussion about what tickets costs, how much money was lost, etc. would be in order if it is available. 2600:1004:B151:380F:B41E:8580:9EF9:7630 (talk) 02:27, 26 January 2018 (UTC)