Talk:2016 Milan–San Remo

2016 Milan–San Remo has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 7, 2016. (Reviewed version).

A fact from 2016 Milan–San Remo appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 March 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the 2016 edition of Milan–San Remo needed to take a 9 km (5.6 mi) detour due to a landslide blocking the original route?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2016 Milan–San Remo.

Wikipedia

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2016 Milan–San Remo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MPJ-DK (talk · contribs) 01:38, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will be picking up the review of this one - both for the Wiki Cup and the GA cup as well, for my fellow Wiki Cup competitor. I will be making my review comments over the next couple of days.

Side note, I would love some input on a Featured List candidate, Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship. I am not asking for Quid pro Quo, but all help is appreciated. MPJ-US 01:38, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Toolbox

I like to get this checked out first, I have found issues using this that has led to quick fails so it's important this passes muster.

Peer review tool

No issues Y

Copyright violations Tool

Just indicating the quotes really, no problems Y

Disambiguation links

No issues Y

External links

No issues Y

Well Written

~~"caused for the" should be "caused the"~~
~~"totaling" typo - should be "totalling"~~
No sources for that list of favorites? that needs a source or two
~~"Meanwhile, first crashes" should be "Meanwhile, the first crashes"~~
~~"on the other hand was" needs a comma after "hand"~~

Sources/verifiable

They're looking okay to me, formatted correctly etc. Y

Broad in coverage

Yes Y

Neutral

Yes Y

Stable

Fairly short lifetime so far, but nothing is looking worrysome Y

Illustrated / Images

Yep, good Y

@Zwerg Nase: - That's my review, congratulations this is probably the least amount of comments I've ever had on a GA nomination. I am putting this on hold to allow for the corrections to be made. MPJ-US 03:34, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Zwerg Nase: - Since I know you're busy I figured I would address the grammatical issues - just need some sourcing around the favorites and you have a Good Article on your hands. MPJ-US 00:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MPJ-DK: Thanks! The sources are actually all there, mainly #3 and #13. Should they be placed differently? I put number 3 behind the sentence with Cavendish, but it applies to the previous sentence as well. Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Zwerg Nase: Excellent, i missed that. Well then we have a GA. Congratulations. MPJ-US 14:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much :) I updated the class template on the talk page. Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2016 Milan–San Remo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2016 Milan–San Remo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]