Talk:2016 Jakarta attacks

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2016 Jakarta attacks article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Photos

I wonder if such a notice box could be useful to gather news photos during such events? Many news outlets use this technique. --Saqib (talk) 09:37, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bit redundant to {{Photo requested}} (meant for talk page headers). I'd prefer not to beg for photos on the incident page. Sounder Bruce 03:32, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:SounderBruce: We beg for edits, then why not photos. But anyways. --Saqib (talk) 10:12, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch response

In the "responses" section, Indonesia is described as a "former Dutch colony". Should we fix that? It's kinda irrelevant to the current subject. Utahwriter14 (talk) 16:06, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is also a diplomatic gaffe if it had been said by Koenders in this context; it wasnt. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 03:21, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Katibah Nusantara

Should the specific military unit of ISIL who perpetrated the attacks be mentioned in the article? It isn't mentioned by most media outlets but some are mentioning it. Krisnata (talk) 15:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC) 11:50, 24 January 2016 (UTC+08:00)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2016 Jakarta attacks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cfr.org/publication/9361/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160113032025/http://smartraveller.gov.au/countries/indonesia to http://smartraveller.gov.au/countries/indonesia
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/english/news/20160115_23.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160115215352/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/national/14-Jan-2016/pm-strongly-condemns-the-blast-near-un-office-in-jakarta to http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/national/14-Jan-2016/pm-strongly-condemns-the-blast-near-un-office-in-jakarta
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160114075325/http://jakarta.usembassy.gov/us-service/wm_160114.html to http://jakarta.usembassy.gov/us-service/wm_160114.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]