Talk:2016 Austrian Grand Prix

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2016 Austrian Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 14:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Will have a look at this. MWright96 (talk) 14:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• no dab links

Lead

• "and marks the thirtieth running of the Austrian Grand Prix" - Marked since the race was held in the past
• Remove the link to Austria in the prose and infobox

Championship

• Wikilink both the Drivers' and Constructors' Championships

Circuit changes

• Spell out the FIA in full

Free practice

• "with Vettel and Kimi Räikkönen third and fourth respectively" - a comma is needed at the end of this sentence
• Delink Max Verstappen since he's already link in the circuit changes sub-section
• Link gravel trap to Run-off area
• Link intermediate tyres to Rain tyre
• Fernando Alonso is not linked

Qualifying

• Delink Nico Hülkenberg, Romain Grosjean
• Spell out Bottas as Valteeri Bottas since it is the first time he is mentioned and add a wikilink
• Same for Felipe Massa

Race

• All mentions of the word "pitted" should be "made a pit stop" to reduce motorsport jargon

Post-race

• "Their head of motorsport," - I think director of motorsport would be better
• Captialise constructors'
• "on now 295 to 192 points." - swap the words "now" and "on"

Classification (Qualifying)

• The fourth note has a citation needed tag

References

• no dead links. However it states the three Associated Press sources are "expiring news links". Can they be archived?

On hold until the points have been actioned. MWright96 (talk) 16:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

@MWright96: Thank you for your review! Unfortunately, I did not get around to deal with all points so far and I will fly to Hungary tomorrow, where I'll have no internet. Could you leave this review open until, say, the 26th? Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:14, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

@Zwerg Nase: Yes, I can do that. :) MWright96 (talk) 19:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

@MWright96: I'm afraid I'll need the weekend as well, I am swamped right now... Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:55, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

@Zwerg Nase: Very well. MWright96 (talk) 20:57, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

@MWright96: Thank you for your patience! I took care of everything now except for capitalizing "constructors'". The reason behind that is while Drivers' Championship is a set term and therefore in capital letters, the equivalent with "standings" is not. Does that make sense? Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:28, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

@Zwerg Nase:. I understand. Not a serious issue but can now promote this to GA. MWright96 (talk) 08:36, 28 August 2016 (UTC)