Jump to content

Talk:2016 24 Hours of Daytona

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2016 24 Hours of Daytona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2016 24 Hours of Daytona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk22:03, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by MWright96 (talk). Self-nominated at 13:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • Expanded well over fivefold on 7 January, long enough, well referenced, with no copyvio hits on Earwig. The original hook is interesting and cited (I changed "be" to "finish" as "saw two cars be" sounds very unnatural to me). The hook could also be tightened by dropping "in first and second places" as this is implied. I suggest not running the ALT1 hook because as someone unfamiliar with motorsport I don't exactly understand what it means or why it's significant, and the hook doesn't entice me to click the link to find out. QPQ is done. 97198 (talk) 13:42, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2016 24 Hours of Daytona/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 16:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "It was the third consecutive year it was part of the WeatherTech SportsCar Championship and the 54th 24 Hours of Daytona." This line should have an inline citation.
  • Since the information in the image caption under "Entry list" is not present in the article, the caption itself should have an inline citation.

Assessment

[edit]
  1. Comprehension: The article is very well written.
  2. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) The prose is clear, concise and understandable. Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) The article is compliant with the manual of style. Pass Pass
  3. Verifiability:The article is verifiable.
  4. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) The article has a list of references and inline citation in the body, some minor issues exist. Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) Sources used appear to be largely reliable. Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) No original research found. Pass Pass
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) No copyright violation or plagiarism found, note earwig's brings a number of false positive due to the names. Pass Pass
  5. Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive enough.
  6. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) The article has a broad coverage of all major aspects. Pass Pass
    (b) (focused) The article is focused without any unnecessary deviations. Pass Pass
  7. Neutrality: The article is neutral.
  8. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view. Pass Pass
  9. Stability: The article is stable.
  10. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    No ongoing edit warring or content disputes exist. Pass Pass
  11. Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
  12. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) Images used are tagged with their appropriate copyright statuses. Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) Use and captions are appropriate and illustrative. Pass Pass