Talk:2015 NBL Canada Finals brawl/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Taking this as requested. Should do this within 24 hours hopefully... JAGUAR 22:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
Checking against the GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- "According to Rainmen player Forrest Fisher, Jones tackled McMorrow to the ground and Express guard Tony Bennett followed up by hitting the center with a chair" - who is the center?
- "NBL Canada executive committee Vito Frijia, who had the bus stop in the middle of the highway" - who had the bus top? Does this mean to say that he was in the bus stop?
- "In the morning of May 2, two days after the brawl" - On the morning
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- No original research found.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
There were a couple of things I found confusing but overall I enjoyed reading it. It is well written, comprehensive and meets the criteria, so I'll pass this outright. JAGUAR 11:15, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Jaguar: I have addressed the issues you pointed out, thanks for the review. TempleM (talk) 20:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC)