Jump to content

Talk:2015 NBL Canada Finals brawl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2015 NBL Canada Finals brawl has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 21, 2016Good article nomineeListed
July 3, 2016Peer reviewReviewed
September 15, 2016Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article



GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 NBL Canada Finals brawl/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Taking this as requested. Should do this within 24 hours hopefully... JAGUAR  22:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "According to Rainmen player Forrest Fisher, Jones tackled McMorrow to the ground and Express guard Tony Bennett followed up by hitting the center with a chair" - who is the center?
    "NBL Canada executive committee Vito Frijia, who had the bus stop in the middle of the highway" - who had the bus top? Does this mean to say that he was in the bus stop?
    "In the morning of May 2, two days after the brawl" - On the morning
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

There were a couple of things I found confusing but overall I enjoyed reading it. It is well written, comprehensive and meets the criteria, so I'll pass this outright. JAGUAR  11:15, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaguar: I have addressed the issues you pointed out, thanks for the review. TempleM (talk) 20:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2015 NBL Canada Finals brawl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]