Talk:2015 Chicago Bears season/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 20:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR 20:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It would be good if the lead could mention what months the season took place in

I done some minor cleaning in the Front office section

Too many red links in the body. It wouldn't hurt cutting down a few

The Undrafted free agents section could do with being split into two paragraphs, to improve prose flow

" Tennessee Titans vice president of player personnel" - Tennessee Titans' vice president of player personnel
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
No original research found.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Overall the prose is well written and the article is definitely comprehensive enough to meet the criteria, so I'll pass this now. JAGUAR 10:44, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]