Jump to content

Talk:2015 Austrian Grand Prix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2015 Austrian Grand Prix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star2015 Austrian Grand Prix is part of the 2015 Formula One season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 28, 2015Good article nomineeListed
September 18, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 Austrian Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Good888 (talk · contribs) 14:03, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Will review this once I have the time. Good888 (talk) 14:03, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

  • I don't think the source in the lead is necessary.
 Done
  • State that Mercedes led Ferrari by 105 points.
 Done

Report

  • Again, state that Mercedes led Ferrari in the background.
 Done
  • "Several other teams introduced updates to their cars as well, including Williams, and McLaren." Not too sure if the second comma is needed. Also, I was wondering if you could add that McLaren had not scored a point before this race, with a citation of course?
I removed the comma. But McLaren had scored before, in Monaco. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • "while the McLarens once again had to stop their session early." Unless that was due to the aerodynamics package a sentence later, I suggest you explain why they had to stop early.
My sources do not say. I moved the second sentence into the first paragraph to avoid confusion.
  • "Before all drivers were able to set times on the super-soft tyres Fernando Alonso coming to a stop on the start/finish straight" Comma before Fernando Alonso.
 Done
  • Also, why did Alonso stop in third practise?
Again, I do not know, so I'll need to leave it at that.
  • "Only Sergio Pérez set a lap on the faster tyre compound" State that he was driving a Force India.
 Done
  • I was wondering if it should be stated that Button and Ricciardo's grid penalties were 25 and 10 respectively?
 Done
  • Link brake-by-wire system.
 Done
  • Why is world champion capitalized in the lead but not in the qualifying?
 Done
  • "At the end of the lap,Daniil Kvyat made a pit stop to replace a damaged front wing" There is no space between the comma and Daniil.
 Done
  • Can you link intake system sensor?
As I understand is, the article Mass flow sensor covers air intake sensors for the cylinders. Since I am unsure if for Button it was this part or the fuel intake meter, I'd rather not link it.
  • "Lewis Hamilton was able to reduce his gap to just 2.2 seconds by lap 32." I would remove the word just in this sentence. Isn't 2.2 seconds still quite alot for F1? It's not as if it's less than a second, hence allowing DRS.
 Done
  • Also, shouldn't it be "the gap"?
 Done
  • "upon checking on the condition of Räikkönen, and relieved that the accident left his former teammate uninjured." Shouldn't it be "was relieved"?
There is a "was" earlier in the sentence, which I believe covers both verbs.
  • "The victory moved Rosberg closer to his teammate in the driver's championship, now ten points behind." Again, should driver's championship be capitalized or not? It is in the lead.
 Done
  • Same with constructor's championship. Capitalized or not?
 Done

Classification

  • I learnt this while reviewing NASCAR articles. Avoid a Sea of blue. Only link the driver and team once. Hence, unlink half of the team links in the Qualifying table and all links in the notes, race and standings tables.

Supporting programme

  • I think this could be incorporated into the background section.
 Done

References

  • After checking with Checklinks, I have found that no links are broken.

A couple of issues but none too major to be honest. Placing on hold. Good888 (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! I'll get to the issues over the weekend :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:43, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All issues should be sorted out now! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:41, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, maybe there will be a discussion amongst the two Wikiprojects. Either way, I am going to promote this to GA status. Good888 (talk) 15:17, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2015 Austrian Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]