Talk:2015 Austrian Grand Prix/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Good888 (talk · contribs) 14:03, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Will review this once I have the time. Good888 (talk) 14:03, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

I don't think the source in the lead is necessary.

Done

State that Mercedes led Ferrari by 105 points.

Done

Report

Again, state that Mercedes led Ferrari in the background.

Done

"Several other teams introduced updates to their cars as well, including Williams, and McLaren." Not too sure if the second comma is needed. Also, I was wondering if you could add that McLaren had not scored a point before this race, with a citation of course?

I removed the comma. But McLaren had scored before, in Monaco. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"while the McLarens once again had to stop their session early." Unless that was due to the aerodynamics package a sentence later, I suggest you explain why they had to stop early.

My sources do not say. I moved the second sentence into the first paragraph to avoid confusion.

"Before all drivers were able to set times on the super-soft tyres Fernando Alonso coming to a stop on the start/finish straight" Comma before Fernando Alonso.

Done

Also, why did Alonso stop in third practise?

Again, I do not know, so I'll need to leave it at that.

"Only Sergio Pérez set a lap on the faster tyre compound" State that he was driving a Force India.

Done

I was wondering if it should be stated that Button and Ricciardo's grid penalties were 25 and 10 respectively?

Done

Link brake-by-wire system.

Done

Why is world champion capitalized in the lead but not in the qualifying?

Done

"At the end of the lap,Daniil Kvyat made a pit stop to replace a damaged front wing" There is no space between the comma and Daniil.

Done

Can you link intake system sensor?

As I understand is, the article Mass flow sensor covers air intake sensors for the cylinders. Since I am unsure if for Button it was this part or the fuel intake meter, I'd rather not link it.

"Lewis Hamilton was able to reduce his gap to just 2.2 seconds by lap 32." I would remove the word just in this sentence. Isn't 2.2 seconds still quite alot for F1? It's not as if it's less than a second, hence allowing DRS.

Done

Also, shouldn't it be "the gap"?

Done

"upon checking on the condition of Räikkönen, and relieved that the accident left his former teammate uninjured." Shouldn't it be "was relieved"?

There is a "was" earlier in the sentence, which I believe covers both verbs.

"The victory moved Rosberg closer to his teammate in the driver's championship, now ten points behind." Again, should driver's championship be capitalized or not? It is in the lead.

Done

Same with constructor's championship. Capitalized or not?

Done

Classification

I learnt this while reviewing NASCAR articles. Avoid a Sea of blue. Only link the driver and team once. Hence, unlink half of the team links in the Qualifying table and all links in the notes, race and standings tables.

That is not how we do it in the F1 Wikiproject. Is it also not in violation of WP:REPEATLINK. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:28, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Supporting programme

I think this could be incorporated into the background section.

Done

References

After checking with Checklinks, I have found that no links are broken.

A couple of issues but none too major to be honest. Placing on hold. Good888 (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! I'll get to the issues over the weekend :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:43, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All issues should be sorted out now! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:41, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe there will be a discussion amongst the two Wikiprojects. Either way, I am going to promote this to GA status. Good888 (talk) 15:17, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]