This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject North AmericaNorth America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
I added the November ice storm 2 days ago, the feb. 7-9 nor'easter is already there, the 4-5 nor'easter is part of the February 2016 North American winter storm, the feb. 11-13 cold wave was already there as was the 14-17 snowstorm and the tornado outbreak. The clipper that followed the nor'easter on feb. 8-9 wasn't too big so it doesn't require a section. --MarioProtIV (talk) 20:45, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support split - This historic storm is highly anticipated, extreme measures are being put in place to prepare for the weather, so it should be given its own article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There's nothing concrete to write about it at the moment, sans some minor impacts across the West with its precursor, it's largely just predictions. Per WP:CRYSTAL: Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. There's still a chance the models are wrong and this storms busts. When the storm gets going and we have something concrete, then an article can be made. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 00:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet- At this point, the only uncertainty in the models is whether there will be 12 inches or 36 inches. Either one would be notable across such a large area of the country. Even if the models are flat out wrong and this turns into a bust, such a colossal failure of every single model out there would in itself be notable. However, there is still very little in the way of concrete information. Although 2034 Atlantic Hurricane season is notable like all such seasons, and there is almost certain to be at least one tropical cyclone that year, it is still far too early to have any concrete information, so such an article does not exist. This is a less extreme example - we should have concrete information within 24-36 hours, at which point WP:SNOW this discussion and create the article. Pun absolutely intended. Smartyllama (talk) 17:07, 21 January 2016 (UTC) It's time. Smartyllama (talk) 16:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - There is little in the way of concrete information, so we would be better off waiting a for short while as the situation unfolds. Dustin(talk)21:19, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: States of emergency have been declared in several states. Flights from multiple airports have been cancelled. Last night/this morning there were over 700 car crashes in Virginia alone. Stores are being emptied out for what is anticipated to be the largest storm in Washington DC history. There are scores of news articles about this. People are making preparations for the storm now. Waiting until tomorrow to debut the article no longer makes sense. gobonobo+c01:21, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is acceptable if we go ahead and make the article for this event. But I would also wait until we get more info before deciding to do this. Opinions? --MarioProtIV (talk) 21:44, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
