This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
There seems to be very little to no evidence that the perpetrator of this van overrun was actually an islamist, a member of ISIS, or even acted in reaction to an ISIS video message. Authorities have denied it, and while some news articles have wondered if there can be such a link, others challenge it. I therefore think that the islamist character of this incident is not defining enough for this article to be classified among islamist terrorism categories, as that would imply that this characteristic is one that reliable sourcescommonly and consistently define[1] the subject as having. I'll therefore remove these categories. I'm not opposed though as having these mentions of press articles wondering about the eventual influence of the ISIS video talked about e.g. in the Motivations section, however these are neither reliable nor common or consistent. Place Clichy (talk) 14:35, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]