Jump to content

Talk:2014 Bahrain Grand Prix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on 2014 Bahrain Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2014 Bahrain Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 13:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Review will follow shortly. Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized that I completely forgot about this review... will give it very soon, so sorry! Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Zwerg Nase: Still haven't heard anything regarding this review. Is everything alright? I understand fully if real life commitments are taking priority. MWright96 (talk) 20:19, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • Same issue as the Monaco article with wording of tyre choice in quali section.
  • He went off into the corner's run-off area onto the exit kerbs.. - it is unclear who "he" is in this context.
  • Hülkenberg took advantage of Bottas sounds weird, I would recommend rephrasing that. He did not rape him after all...
    • Changed to Hülkenberg overtook Bottas
  • Having saved more fuel, he would have more horsepower available - I guess "he" is Rosberg, not Ricciardo??
  • Ricciardo locked his tyres going into turn one and narrowly avoided impacting the Ferrari - which Ferrari?
  • Maldonado was unable to react to Gutiérrez steering right into the first corner and hit his right-rear corner, rolling over twice in the air - this sounds like Maldonado rolled over, but it was Gutierrez
  • Pérez fended off a challenge from teammate Hülkenberg for third and defended from Vettel. Button fell to seventh after being passed by Vettel - the timeline seems off here. I would recommend just removing the second part of the first sentence which mentions Vettel, because it also sounds like Perez and not Hülkenberg was defending from him.
  • Ricciardo passed teammate Vettel for fourth - for fifth if I am not mistaken??

As you can see, mainly some inconsistency in the race report prose need to be sorted out here. Great work so far! Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! I can promote this to GA. Sorry again for the huge delay and congrats! Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:59, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]