Talk:2011 census of India

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2011 census of India article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

India: History Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in December 2014.

On 23 October 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from 2011 Census of India to 2011 census of India. The result of the discussion was moved.

Census website on blacklist

I cannot add any links for census2011.co.in because it is listed in Wikipedia's blacklist. Can anyone remove? NagalimNE (talk) 07:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see a lot of articles using this website as a citation now. Has the blacklisting changed? If so, why? Can someone {{help}} me out please? Tanyasingh (talk) 10:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tanyasingh, "a lot of articles"? Links please. Cabayi (talk) 17:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tanyasingh and Cabayi: MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/April 2020 § census2011.co.in, the most recent whitelisting request, was declined as not being the official census data. The earliest blacklisting request I could find is under MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/May 2019 § onefivenine.com. Perhaps the results of a census2011.co.in

query were added before May 2019. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 18:25, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that deep research, @Rotideypoc41352: !! @NagalimNE:, these articles That's one too many :| : Tanyasingh (talk) 05:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Pasting deleted material from another article

I've just deleted the following material from the page Baháʼí Faith in India as a violation of WP:SYNTH. However it may be useful for this page.

The census has been under some criticism and scholars regularly use corrections.^[1]^[2]

References

^ How reliable are India's official statistics?, by Ankush Agrawal, IEG, and Vikas Kumar, EastAsiaForum.org, 6 April 2012
^ Sharada Srinivasan; Arjun Singh Bedi (18 September 2008). "Daughter Elimination in Tamil Nadu, India: A Tale of Two Ratios". The Journal of Development Studies. 44 (7): 961–990. doi:10.1080/00220380802150755. ISSN 1743-9140. S2CID 154359140. The civil registration system which in principle should be able to provide district level figures on birth, death, infant mortality and other vital events is not complete and far from reliable."… "In the Indian context, in the absence of a complete civil registration system…

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1879 population census in Bosnia and Herzegovina which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 October 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Per consensus. – robertsky (talk) 15:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC) – robertsky (talk) 15:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

– Per consensus reached at Talk:2020_United_States_census/Archive_1#Requested_move_16_November_2020 that "census" is a common noun and should be lowercase. This move would put these articles in line with other similar articles such as 1950 United States census, 2021 Canadian census, and 1841 census of Ireland. As always, feel free to suggest any that I may have missed. Woko Sapien (talk) 18:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per previous consensus Yoblyblob (talk) 14:01, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Woko Sapien 1769 Census (Denmark–Norway) Yoblyblob (talk) 13:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch! Added it to the list. Woko Sapien (talk) 14:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment looked through to see if these were all of them and found these articles, which I'm not entirely sure if they would fall under the purview of this RM: 2011 Botswana Population and Housing Census, Next Ukrainian Census, 2014 Myanmar Census, 2021 Population Census in Hong Kong, and Population Census in Hong Kong. In any case, I support the proposed move per nom. Cheers, Dan the Animator 01:52, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Dantheanimator for the most part, I would say yes. Woko Sapien (talk) 00:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Great, I'll add them to the list. Cheers, Dan the Animator 00:42, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Woko Sapien: By the way, I only uncapitalized census since that's the focus of this RM but feel free to also decapitalize the words "population" and "housing" in some of the articles I added since they're also common nouns to my knowledge. Dan the Animator 00:47, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Dantheanimator all set! Woko Sapien (talk) 01:37, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support all as modified, noting that the Botswana Notes and Records, Volume 46, Special Issue on the 2011 Botswana Population and Housing Census uses lowercase "population and housing census" throughout, including for specific years. Dicklyon (talk) 00:27, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

[1] How reliable are India's official statistics?, by Ankush Agrawal, IEG, and Vikas Kumar, EastAsiaForum.org, 6 April 2012

[2] Sharada Srinivasan; Arjun Singh Bedi (18 September 2008). "Daughter Elimination in Tamil Nadu, India: A Tale of Two Ratios". The Journal of Development Studies. 44 (7): 961–990. doi:10.1080/00220380802150755. ISSN 1743-9140. S2CID 154359140. The civil registration system which in principle should be able to provide district level figures on birth, death, infant mortality and other vital events is not complete and far from reliable."… "In the Indian context, in the absence of a complete civil registration system…

[1]

[2]