Talk:2011 Tirreno–Adriatico

2011 Tirreno–Adriatico has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 18, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Mid‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2011 Tirreno–Adriatico/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 00:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:57, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Prose good, organization good. I made a few minor copy-edits. Complies sufficiently with key MoS elements. I note US English spelling, you might wish to put Template:American English on the talk page.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
References appear RS, support the cited statements, no evidence of OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Sufficient detail without unnecessary trivia.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Stable
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Captioned and licensed OK
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I have no hesitation in passing this as a good artcile. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:21, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2011 Tirreno–Adriatico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110318172554/http://www.cyclingnews.com/races/46th-tirreno-adriatico-his/stage-7/results to http://www.cyclingnews.com/races/46th-tirreno-adriatico-his/stage-7/results

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria due to the vast amount of uncited text in the article, including entire paragraphs. Is anyone interested in addressing this concern, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 00:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]