Talk:2009–10 La Liga

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Spanish football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

League table

How come Real Madrid is P.2 and Sevilla is P.3 after round 6? Aren't these the rules for classification? 1st points; 2nd head-to-head points 83.35.82.84 (talk) 21:07, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Head to head means when both teams have played each other twice (round 6 and round 25). So as they have only played once, we have to put them by their goal-difference. Qampunen (talk) 21:18, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deportivo la Coruña

Can the club name be corrected as it should read Deportivo la Coruña instead of Deportivo La Coruna? LaFuzion (talk) 23:36, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Real Madrid not yet qualified for UCL Group Stage after Round 29

This might sound a little bit picky, but Real Madrid are not yet qualified for the Group Stage of next season's UEFA Champions League. The reason is that they still have to play their second match against Mallorca, which makes it mathematically possible for them to still fall back to 4th, thanks to the head-to-head tie breaker on equal points.

In contrast to that, Barcelona have already played both their matches against Mallorca, and won both as well, so they cannot be removed from a Group Stage berth. --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 21:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

messi has 10 assist not 9

Messi has 10 assist not 9 (86.123.192.88 (talk) 07:28, 10 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

clarification about 4-way tie at 36 points after matchday 37

Please clarify:
after matchday 37 there are 4 teams tied at 36 points
rule for classification #2 states the clubs should be ranked by: "head-to-head points"

here is an excerpt of the results table between the 4 tied teams

--- VAL RAC MAL TEN VAL --- 2-1 1-2 3-3 RAC 0-1 --- 0-0 2-0 MAL 0-1 1-2 --- 1-1 TEN 0-0 2-1 1-0 --- according to this table, the HEAD-TO-HEAD ranking should be as follows:

16. Valladolid 11 pts (4 home + 7 away)
17. TENERIFE 9 pts (7 home + 2 away)
18. R.SANTANDER 7 pts (4 home + 3 away)
19. Málaga 5 pts (1 home + 4 away)

the "head-to-head" columns in the League Table reports instead:

VLD: 8 pts
RAC: 7 pts > 6 pts
MAL: 7 pts > 5 pts > TEN 2-2 MLG
TEN: 7 pts > 5 pts > MLG 1-1 TEN

How did you calculate those points?
I understood that "head-to-head points" meant "the points obtained in the matches between the tied teams"
For instance, Tenerife won at home v.RAC and v.MAL and drew v.VAL, then drew away @VAL and @MAL
This makes 2 Wins and 3 Draws, 2*3 + 3*1 + 1*0 = 9pts, not 7 as you reported

Thank you in advance
195.210.94.1 (talk) 13:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Mario Squillace

You're absolutely right. Was perhaps a Valladolidista who calculated these points.^^ I will fix it in the next couple of minutes. --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 13:37, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was right from the beginning

You are absolutely wrong. Tenerife did not win at home against Málaga 2-2 (you got most of the results completely wrong). The classification was correct from the beginning. When four teams draw in points, you look at the head to head which is: (THESE ARE THE CORRECT RESULTS))

--- VAL RAC MAL TEN VAL --- 2-1 1-1 3-3 RAC 1-1 --- 0-3 2-0 MAL 0-0 1-2 --- 1-1 TEN 0-0 2-1 2-2 ---

Valladolid 8 points, The rest got 7 points. Therefore you exclude Valladolid and look at the head to head between Racing, Málaga and Tenerife. Which would then be: Racing 7 points. Málaga 5 points. (By goal-difference) Tenerife 5 points.

Ok? Tenerife is NO WAY out of the relegation zone. Qampunen (talk) 15:35, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Villarreal TQ?

Can anyone explain why Villarreal appears as "qualified to tournament"? As far as I know, Atlético can still 'qualify' to the 2010–11 UEFA Europa League through Copa del Rey, so the 7th placed team wouldn't play in any continental tournament. UEFA says:

If the titleholder does qualify for the UEFA Europa League through its domestic competitions, the number of places to which its national association is entitled in the UEFA Europa League does not change. Source. Escorpión Canalla (talk) 10:40, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, Atlético Madrid will use the Copa del Rey spot to qualify for the UEFA Europa League and they will play in the group stage as the title-holder, the 7th placed team will not play in europe as other ranked countries will use the spot. -- HonorTheKing (talk) 12:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If Sevilla wins the 2010 Copa del Rey Final, then Villarreal would qualify for the 2010–11 UEFA Europa League. I believe they will qualify for the Third qualifying round and Getafe would move up to the Play-off Round. La Fuzion (talk) 22:07, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, Lafuzion but you are wrong. Villarreal could only qualify if Sevilla ended up 5th and won the Copa del Rey. As they have ended up 4th, Villarreal can no longer qualify for UEFA Europa League. Qampunen (talk) 22:12, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're right... I just read it and was about to correct my error... Apologies... La Fuzion (talk) 22:17, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on 2009–10 La Liga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on 2009–10 La Liga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:07, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2009–10 La Liga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]