User talk:ECanalla

Bienvenida

Hola amigo!!

Como va, amigo canalla!!! Yo soy de Rosario, y obviamente canalla. Te invito a que también colabores conmigo en la wiki en español [1]

¿Así que sos español? ¿Y canalla nacido allá?

Te mando un abrazo.

Saludos --Ultracanalla (talk) 23:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Gracias, amigazo. Lo mismo para vos!!!. Después, cuando tengas tiempo, metete en la wiki en español y leé el articulazo de Central que humildemente he ido modelando con el tiempo. Ya es cosiderado un "Artículo Bueno". Mi objetivo es que pronto sea "Artículo Destacado".

Otro abrazo, --Ultracanalla (talk) 23:46, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Copa de la UEFA

Hola, amigo canalla!!

¿Cómo te va, tanto tiempo? Te convoco porque hay una disputa en el artículo UEFA Cup. Es sobre la Copa de Ferias y la Copa Uefa. ¿Podrías dar tu opinión en la página de discusión de ese artículo? También hay una votación aquí sobre este tema [2].

Saludos canallas, --Ultracanalla (talk) 23:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

TEVENET

Perdon

Hola CANALLA, aquí VASCO de PORTUGAL,

Creo que debo disculparme, especialmente porque creo que sentiste que yo fui un poco rudo pero no fue así, simplemente desde joven que sigo la liga Española e siempre vi a TEVENET ubicado como delantero, y todos los webs lo confirman, ahí mi insistencia.

Asimismo, claro que creo en tu palabra de que juega como medio o mediapunta en ORIHUELA (por cierto, buen trabajo frente al poderoso ATLETICO en COPA), y te dejo esta sugestión: no se podría inserir en su caja de datos (INFOBOX) que juega como "attacking midfielder/striker" en lugar de solo una u otra posición?

Desde PORTUGAL, un saludo y perdona si te parecí "subido de tono".

VASCO AMARAL - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 15:04, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Comprendido

Hola otra vez, CANALLA, VASCO al habla,

Muchas gracias por tus aportaciones sobre el personaje en cuestión. Tema zanjado, ATTACKING MIDFIELDER queda, hombre!! ;) (a lo mejor mi confusión se debe a que jugó como punta en el SEVILLA hace màs de 10 añazos, e luego mayoritariamente en SEGUNDA e SEGUNDA B, sin tanto enfoque de TV)

Y sí que tienes razón en relación a mi manera de hacer los sumarios, algunas vezes deja un poquito que desear... :(

Un saludo cordial, buen fin de semana,

VASCO AMARAL - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Un dado cómico

VASCO otra vez, CANALLA,

Por cierto, la foto en el primer enlace (ABC.es) no tiene desperdicio, que cara de susto, creo que es de PATRICIO GRAFF, otro que tuvo sus momentos en LA LIGA. Me podrías decir donde juega actualmente (creo que ya deve andar por los 35, 36)?

Sin más, otro saludo de vecino iberico,

VASCO AMARAL - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 16:52, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Saludos y una pregunta

Hola CANALLA, qué tal, aqui VASCO,

Espero que todo vaya bien contigo y un magnífico 2009 para tí y los tuyos.

Ahora ya estoy registrado en WIKI, pero quando editaba anonimamente, tuvimos "nuestros más y nuestros menos" en el artículo de Luis Tevenet (en grandísima parte por mi culpa, sin duda). My pregunta para tí es la siguiente: como eres español, acaso sabrás que ha pasado con el enlace WWW.LFP.ES (muy útil, lo utilizaba en todos los artículos de jugadores españoles o con larga estancia en el país)? No funciona, en TEVENET también lo puedes encontrar.

Cuando digo que no funciona, no es totalmente cierto: si tecleas WWW.LFP.ES, entras en una página de la LIGA PROFESIONAL sin duda, lo que no funciona es el enlace que hay en los artículos aqui en la WIKI, en esa "nueva" página no hay ningún enlace con estadísticas.

En todo caso, un saludo portugués y muy buenas, hasta otra,

VASCO AMARAL - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 23:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Los Arcos Tribuna.JPG

File:Los Arcos Tribuna.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Estadi Los Arcos Torrevella.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Estadi Los Arcos Torrevella.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Disculpas, etc

Hola CANALLA, VASCO al habla,

Te importaría decirme en que artículo cres que fui maleducado para enviarme el mensaje a mi dirección anónima (ver aquí http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:217.129.65.5&diff=cur)? Creo que fue lo que escribí en Orihuela CF, si a eso te refieres, mis disculpas. Un poco histerico sí, maleducado no, o eso creo.

Interesante como solo recibo mensajes por estos temas, curiosamente, cuando intenté hablar contigo por un tema en qué tenía dudas, no recebí una sola palabra a cambio (ver mensaje titulado "Saludos y una pregunta"), no lo entiendo deveras. En una cosa sí te doy la razón: en algunos sumarios si que parezco un poco "cabra loca", debo intentar mejorarlo sin duda.

Que todo vaya bien, mis disculpas otra vez, desde Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 02:32, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

• Increíble pero cierto. Puedo ser yo el que lo ha leído mal, pero creo que no aceptas mis disculpas, y estás diciendo que TODOS mis sumarios son así, en cualquier circunstancia. OK es tu opinión, yo sé lo que hago. Si miras un poco arriba en mi página de conversación, verás que User:Fache - y él también sabe como son mis sumarios - tiene otra opinión, pero si prefieres verme así, bueno.

Hablando de la parte "técnica" ahora: claro que sé que Kiko Ratón es un apodo, pero creí que dentro del apodo, habría que ordenarlo, como si el apodo fuera en si un nombre propio. OK, no te preocupes, si lo re-ordenas, quedará como quede, no problem. No creo que pase lo mismo con Manolo Cases, ya que "Manolo" es un diminutivo de Manuel, y "Cases" es su nombre verdadero.

Otra cosa interesante que veo en muchos mensajes (el tuyo uno de ellos) es cuando después de algo mal hecho por mi parte, la respuesta viene seca, sin más, aunque me disculpe. De verdad, no lo entiendo, pero cada cual como cada cual. A mí me han dicho de todo ("cunt", "fuck off", "faggot"), y solo porqué? Porque los muy vándalos "hacían sus cosas" y yo o les bloqueaba o bloqueaba las páginas. También ya he sido insultado por hacer nada (ver aquí http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Festus_Agu&diff=387812777&oldid=387812298). Tienes todo el derecho a tu opinión, por supuesto (muy interesante el "a mí me da igual lo que hagas, ya te conozco", y otra vez, a lo mejor mi error pero ahora estás tu siendo un poco agresivo). Claro que tengo que mejorar mis sumarios y mucho, sin lugar a dudas!

Si necesitas (aunque dudo de si necesitas y quieres, vista tu idea te mí) my ayuda en algo por WP, ponte en contacto, por favor. Ah, y insultos, solamente los he dirigido hacia los vándalos, que no tienen NADA que hacer por aquí (si tienes "ejemplos" de lo que cres ser un insulto hacia un "no-vándalo", por favor enseñamelo). Hasta otra - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

• Increíble x 2!! Te he dado la razón en K.RATÓN y lo he corregido, pero me parecía que M.CASES era un asunto distinto - el primero son todo apodos, el segundo es "a medias" - sin pretender saber más del Orihuela CF que tú, ni por asomo. Otra vez, qué consigo a cambio, estando intentando al máximo que nos llevemos bien? Agresividad ("no sé ni por qué vuelves a editar para mencionarlo. En fin..." Por qué? Porque he seguido tu sugestión en el caso de Ratón!), máxime quando había dicho que la seción de los jugadores del club quedaría como tu decidieras. Estoy intentando colaborar de la mejor manera que puedo (ya los sumarios son una cosa que debo trabajar bastante), y basicamente me estás diciendo que yo soy uno de esos que "me lo sé todo". Nada más lejos de la verdad, pero allá tu.

Ah, y volviendo atrás, permíteme que te apunte un error - si se puede - Rui Costa, en qualquier lista de "Famous players" en que esté, deberá estar ordenado por la "C", no por la "R", como Cristiano Ronaldo por la "R" y no por la "C". Atentamente - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 22:03, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

• Y, si no te importa, me gustaría mucho que pudieras decirme si de verdad cres que TODOS mis sumarios son así de estúpidos y maleducados y, si así es, darme ejemplos. No creo que sea de muy buen tono atacar a uno y después quedarse tan pancho. Si soy yo el que te hal malinterpretado, mis disculpas. - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 22:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

• Realmente no lo entiendo. Te estoy perguntando algo de manera educada, y ni una sola palabra de tu parte (pero decirme que estoy diciendo que se más que tú del Orihuela CF quando en ningun momento he dicho eso si me lo sabes "espetar", yo soy el borde, de acuerdo). Claro que uno tiene vida más allá de WP, pero veo que ya te has conectado dos vezes después de lo sucedido, y nada...OK, no te molestaré más, te pido que hagas lo mismo y, en el futuro, si tienes algo en contra de mi manera de actuar, contacta directamente con los administradores y no conmigo.

Claro que tengo que mejorar la mayor parte de mis sumarios - no TODOS! - es una lucha diaria (y eso de que me ya me conoces? Ni tú a mí ni yo a tí, así de simple; por ejemplo, algunas veces quando escribo con CAPS, no estoy gritando, pero haciendo hincapie en un punto/palabra en particular), y si bien estoy de acuerdo contigo que llega un punto en el que las disculpas sobran, al menos hacerlo es decir "estuve mal". Pero bueno, si no hay más vuelta a dar, entonces no lo hay, allá tu.

Atentamente - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 04:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

• Claro que sí, te doy la razón, tampoco quiero entrar en una discusión sin fin contigo. Gracias por la contestación, y ahora, punto por punto sobre la dicha: 1 - "Yo solo te sugerí una cosa, a partir de ahí, haz lo que creas conveniente": tus sugestiones en el artículo pertinente (Orihuela) han sido aceptadas, como puedes ver no he editado más allí); 2 - "Ya dije todo lo que tenía que decir y veo que sigues editando el último mensaje que me dejaste.": no comprendo tu reacción, he visto que faltaban algunas cosas en el mensaje original y lo he añadido, una semana después, eso es todo; 3 - Mi pergunta (Cres que todos mis sumarios son maleducados?) sigue sin ser contestada, pero de nuevo vuelvo a darte la razón, no voy a hacerte perder tu tiempo en este asunto que "ya huele", no quieres contestar, pues no lo haces, yo tengo mi respuesta, tu tendrás tu opinión. Tema zanjado, palabra de honor.

Felices fiestas, hasta otra - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 00:41, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Formations

Hey, how did you made those? I would like to help with the others! Kante4 (talk) 23:37, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Don´t know how to anything proper in there. Have inkscape and the field, it´s opened in the program but i don´t have a clue what to do... Kante4 (talk) 01:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, tried it. When i click on the arrow i can only move the whole picture and the shirts won´t change the colour somehow... DO i have an older version, took the one from the top. Kante4 (talk) 01:32, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Now it works, with IE. ;) Nice hint. Thanks for the help, will try it for one of the next games and will send it to you first to se if it is right. ;) Kante4 (talk) 01:57, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Just made a quick test here: here. Kante4 (talk) 02:06, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, i did not care about lining up and this stuff, just wanted to see if it looks like the other ones and it does, so thank you very much! :) Kante4 (talk) 02:23, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Japan-Jordan

Hey, good or not? Did not know the kit of the Jordan goalie, just saw the japanese had a yellow one... Kante4 (talk) 14:09, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

I changed the kit a minute ago. I waited for the-afc.com to update the formation as they do that normally 15-20 minutes in. That´s why i waited until HT before i saved it. I took it from there directly. The names in the Asian Zone are a problem most of the time for people not knowing everything about it... Kante4 (talk) 14:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Yep, afc changed it again and so did i. For the later game i wait until the match is almost over or if you want you can do it. Just tell me. Kante4 (talk) 14:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, when i´m not updating i should be away and may be not able to update during the whole game. I just don´t want to take anything away from you. ;) Kante4 (talk) 15:11, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Ok, later on i should be here and are able to do it. In the next days we have to see. ;) Kante4 (talk) 15:15, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. That´s the bug, i was already wondered and tried different things. I will see if i can fix it now. Kante4 (talk) 17:55, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

AFC Day 4

According to afc.com he played as a striker up front with Cahill. Kante4 (talk) 18:30, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

I believe you and go ahead to edit it to make it right as we want accuracy. I did not watched the games so i go by afc-com but if someone knows it better it´s alright! :) Kante4 (talk) 18:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Reply to discussion

Hi there CANALLA, VASCO here,

this is something new isn't it? So, i write to you...My last summary in Orihuela CF was not offensive at all, no insults there, i said what i feel (yes i know summaries are not for that), which is: you can't stand me and/or my behaviour, be honest at least. I was also feeling a little frustrated with your silence towards me, but that's in the past now. I won't apologize for that last summary because i did not insult you, i merely voiced my frustration.

I see you have reported me (in two places!) and not notified me the least, like done to a common vandal, also inserting lies in said report ("...he flatters himself..." in summaries?!). I have replied at the last one after being tipped by another user, and he has already re-replied, you are welcome to leave your input if you feel something i said was unfair and out of proportion (as always).

Hopefully we can work together well if the occasion arises (i have a feeling you do not wish to do so, just a feeling), keep up the good work. - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 16:38, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

LAST MESSAGE i promise man :) How do you say "we can get along well" when your aggressiveness towards me never ends? I am sorry if my last summary at Orihuela was out of order, honestly, i did not want to make you look bad, why should i? However, i do remind you i can say whatever i want in summaries just as long as i don't "cross the line". I will keep giving vandals what they deserve, but I PROMISE i will never write any more aggressive messages to anyone who is, as yourself, a well-intended user.

Keep up the good work, but only one question? If i have any questions or doubts regarding football questions, can i write to you? Thanks in advance - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 00:47, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Transfers

Tranquilízate, amigo. Lo de Keko lo entiendo pero a Corominas se le pone Ferran Corominas porque así se le ha conocido hace tiempo. Es como si a Agüero le pusiese Kun, o a Weligton le pusiese Welli. Si el arículo se llama Ferran Corominas (¿por qué poner Coro?) Si tú le preguntas a alguien quién es Ferran Corominas, pues es mejor que si le preguntas quién es Coro. A Sergio Gontán, por ejemplo, no se le conoce futbolísticamente como tal, sino como Keko (que se escribe de forma muy distinta). Los dicho, agradezco tus intentos de contribución pero en ningún momento ha habido aquí una guerra. No exageres. Saludos. Qampunen (talk) 10:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Keep up the good work! Vasco Amaral (talk) 14:17, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

• Just to clear things out, because i don't want any misunderstandings: obviously you have been here long enough to know barnstars are only handed when you accomplish something extraordinary, not just because. So, you must have thought i was making fun of you or anything. No sir, in no way, i was only trying to build a bridge, could not think of a better way to do it.

My apologies if you felt offended, not my intention. All the best, goodbye - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 14:43, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Argentine football.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ECanalla. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2010 UEFA Futsal Championship logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2010 UEFA Futsal Championship logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ECanalla. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ECanalla. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)