Talk:2008 United States presidential election in Arkansas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Arkansas / Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arkansas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections.

Untitled

Arkansas is arguably the only state where racist voting could have been important enough to make a difference in the overall winner... AnonMoos (talk) 02:59, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

County Results

This article needs the detailed county results like every other state election article. --Jerzeykydd (talk) 15:20, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on United States presidential election in Arkansas, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on United States presidential election in Arkansas, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obama got 14,122; not 14,955 votes in Faulkner County, Arkansas

This is also fully confirmed to be the case. Basically when in the process of transcribing the votes in a precinct named "Harve" to the now removed official results site, someone accidentially added an extra digit to Obamas total, incorrectly giving him 925 votes when his actual total was just 92 votes, an 833 vote difference. It makes perfect sense that this correction is needed; said precinct infact had a population lower than its reported vote total for Obama, and was broadly Republican in other elections both before and after, including many where the county and state as a whole were far more competitive, yet was reported as giving Obama about 80% of the vote. What confirms this is that the now delisted site also included listings of the total number of voters who showed up in each precinct in many counties, including this county. The sum of voters who showed up for every single race in this precinct except for the Presidential race was reported to be identical, as it should be, because people either show up to cast a ballot that lists every race in a precinct, or fail to show up. However, the total number of voters who showed up for the Presidential race was reported as a number 833 votes higher, with Obama the only candidate getting as many or more votes in the precinct as the error in question indicated were accidentially added. MappedTables (talk) 22:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]