Talk:2008 United States presidential election in Alabama

This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance).

Racial polarization

Does anyone think that this must be mentioned in this section as well?

Alabama whites voted for McCain by a 90-10 margin, Alabama blacks by a margin of 98-2 (that is not a misprint or typo btw). rock8591 04:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

I'd think it would be worth mentioning; can you provide a reliable source for those numbers? Qqqqqq (talk) 07:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that - there is a problem with those numbers (PM me if you're interested in details or whatnot). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rock8591 (talk • contribs) 04:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My Changes

O.K. So I've been editing the articles on the election in each state, and I came to this article and did something a bit different. In the other articles, normally I've been adding completely new information to stubs; here there already was a lot of info, although I did fill out the analysis of the election itself.

The point is that I made some stylistic changes. The first two paragraphs of the "Analysis" section were, I felt, cluttered with too much extraneous detail. I took out some of that, such as the description of Democratic control of Alabama's State Senate. In addition, some of the sentences were very complex and convuluted to my eye. I tried simplifying it (such as the three-line long spiel on how Obama did better than Kerry).

The reason I'm saying this is that I don't want anybody to feel offended that some of their work was deleted and press the "Undo" button.

Also, I added the exit poll information of racial polarization. I think its very relevant; moreover, we can put the "problem with those numbers" as a note on the references section. Which is what I think is done in academica. Hadoren (talk) 23:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mobile Flag.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Mobile Flag.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:32, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on United States presidential election in Alabama, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]