Jump to content

Talk:2008 Tanana Valley flood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2008 Tanana Valley flood has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 20, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 8, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 2008 Tanana Valley flood brought the Tanana River in central Alaska to its highest level since August 1967?

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:2008 Tanana Valley flood/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I'll be doing the GA review for this article, and I should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 00:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • External links go after references, not before.
    • Non-breaking spaces (-&nbsp) should be used between numbers and units.
    • For an article this length, there really should be two paragraphs in the lead. My suggestion would be to split it into two paragraphs and add a two or three sentences summarizing your "Background" and "Aftermath" sections.
    • In the "Fairbanks" section, you say "Several residents of the Rosie Creek neighborhood". Why only several of the residents? Is there a reason to not just say "Residents of the Rosie Creek..."?
    • In the "Nenana" section, you say "Native leaders encouraged residents". Why specify native? Would it be possible to reword as "City leaders..."?
    • In the "Aftermath" section, you say "On August 4, Alaska governor Sarah Palin visited Fairbanks to officially sign the disaster declaration and to visit the flooded area." You have her visiting things twice in the same sentence. Can one of the visits be replaced by another word?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • Current ref 14 (Bohman) needs publisher information
    • There are two spots that need refs:
      • The very last half sentence in the "Background" section
      • The last sentence in the first paragraph of the "Aftermath" section
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    • The first two images (graphs) need captions
    • The images in the Salcha and Nenana sections should be moved down slightly so that they don't seperate the headers from the text.
    • Try to make your image captions more concise, and you don't need to mention the flood by name in them. For example, instead of "A Fairbanks shooting range is closed due to flooding during the 2008 Tanana Valley flood.", just say "A Fairbanks shooting range closed due to the flood". The article is about the 2008 Tanana Valley flood, therefore, implicitly, all of the photos should be of the flood. If they're not, we've got bigger problems than captions *grin*
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

All of the things I've mentioned above are fairly minor, and should be easy to correct. I am putting this article on hold for seven days in order to allow you time to work on the final tweaks necessary to the article. If you have questions, you can ask them here on the review page (I have it watchlisted) or on my talk page. Dana boomer (talk) 00:46, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article! Dana boomer (talk) 12:23, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on 2008 Tanana Valley flood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2008_Tanana_Valley_flood&oldid=1196523978"