Talk:2008 NCAA Division I baseball tournament

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject College baseball (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Someone Help! Silversword55 (talk) 17:09, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Record by conference

Overall 139–139

WAC 10–4 Fresno St 10–4

SEC 24–21 Alab 1–2 Ark 0–2 Fla 0–2 Ga 10–4 Ky 2–2 LSU 6–3 Ole Miss 2–2 S Caro 2–2 Vand 1–2

ACC 27–15 Fla St 6–4 Ga Tech 2–2 Miami 6–3 N Caro 8–2 NC St 4–2 Virg 1–2

PAC 10 18–11 Ariz 4–2 Az St 4–2 Cal 0–2 Stanford 8–3 UCLA 2–2

Conf USA 14–10 E Caro 2–2 Houston 3–2 Rice 5–2 S Miss 2–2 Tulane 2–2

Big West 10–9 UC Davis 1–2 UC Irvine 4–2 CS Full 4–3 Long Beach 1–2

Big 12 11–13 Missouri 1–2 Nebr 1–2 Okla 2–2 Ok St 2–2 Texas 2–2 Tex A&M 3–3

Big East 1–4 Louisville 0–2 St. John's 1–2

Colonial 3–4 UNC Wilm 2–2 James Madison 1–2

Sun Belt 1–4 New Orleans 1–2 W Ky 0–2

WCC 5–4 Pepperdine 2–2 San Diego 3–2

Big South 3–2 Coastal Caro 3–2

MVC 4–2 Wich St 4–2

Other 8–36 Lipscomb 1–2 Charlotte 0–2 Stony Brook 0–2 Michigan 1–2 UIC 1–2 Dallas Bapt 0–2 Coumbia 0–2 Rider 0–2 E Mich 0–2 Bethune-Cookman 0–2 TCU 1–2 Mt. St. Mary 0–2 E Ill 0–2 Bucknell 1–2 Elon 1–2 Sam Houston St 0–2 Texas Southern 0–2 Oral Roberts 2–2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay Jor (talk • contribs) 01:46, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Myrtle Beach Regional

Is the Myrtle Beach regional being hosted at BB&T Coastal Field or Charles Watson Stadium on Coastal Carolina's campus? A few articles I've seen indicate it will be at CCU [1], [2], and [3]. Does anyone have any information saying it will be at BB&T Coastal Field? Patken4 (talk) 21:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Format

Is it necessary to list the records in the brackets themselves? That's not done on any other yet. Better to make a chart or something that lists records, conference records, RPI, etc., and make the brackets clean. Jhn31 (talk) 01:58, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking maybe a table at the top along these lines:

Coral Gables Regional
Seed	School	Conference	Record	Conference Record	Berth type
1	#1 Miami FL	ACC	47-8	23-5	Tournament Champions
2	Missouri	Big 12	38-19	16-11	At-large bid
3	Mississippi	SEC	37-24	15-15	At-large bid
4	Bethune Cookman	MEAC	36-20	17-1	Tournament Champions

Ann Arbor Regional
Seed	School	Conference	Record	Conference Record	Berth type
1	Arizona	Pac-10	38-17	12-12	At-large bid
2	Michigan	Big 10	45-12	26-5	Tournament Champions
3	Kentucky	SEC	42-17	16-14	At-large bid
4	Eastern Michigan	MAC	25-32	15-8	Tournament Champions

Maybe the "Tournament Champions" could link to the article on that particular tournament. This would clean up the brackets and make it look nice. Obviously the columns lengths should be tweaked, but something along these lines I think would look really nice.Jhn31 (talk) 02:19, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The record of the team does not need to be in the bracket. In fact, it messes up the bracket display quite frequently. I like your idea for the tables. Seancp (talk) 02:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also see no reason to italicize in the bracket for the home team. It's not done on any other year, and looks jarring to the eye. It's clear who the host is from the name of the regional. Jhn31 (talk) 23:45, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again I agree with you. I had actually planned to just let the tourney play out and then go in later and clean up the article. Right now there are too many anonymous editors and its difficult to keep the format consistent. If you remove something or change something then they will just go in and revert it....so if you just wait it out then we can get it looking nice and standardized later on. Seancp (talk) 00:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]