Jump to content

Talk:2008 Cincinnati Reds season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ken Griffey, Jr.

[edit]

Where can we add something about Griffey's 600th HR? Adding all of the information in the intro doesn't seem appropriate.   jj137 (talk) 18:27, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


"These two moves left gaping holes in the Reds' outfield that they have since struggled to fill." I removed this line because its someone's opinion. Many Reds fans were very happy to see Dunn and Griffey gone and think the replacements they have for them (Dickerson, Tavares, Hopper) are superior. Danschierling (talk) 18:00, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea.   jj137 (talk) 00:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2008 Cincinnati Reds season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:35, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]