Talk:2007 United Kingdom floods/Archive 1

Archive 1

Heading style

Just a note on heading style. Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings) advises to use ==heading== and ===subheading===. --Elliskev 18:34, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Link to Hull (City)

In the Impacted areas - Humberside section there is a red link to Hull (City). Is this the same as Kingston upon Hull? --Elliskev 19:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes generaly known as Hull but the correct term is Kingston upon Hull.— Rod ^talk 19:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

I've now made a redirect, too - just in case. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 06:41, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Cause for all this?

Could we get a section outlining the cause for the flooding? And how about a "reaction" section too? 82.16.7.63 05:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Not a great source, but there was someone on the radio yesterday blaming it not on global warming 9for once0 but on [[flood plainn building and the canalising of rivers - in essence, water that would normally be absorbed naturally now can't, and it washes onto farmalnd and towns. I'll try to find a source for this statement. Totnesmartin 14:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Rain. Lugnuts 19:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

LOL.-- M2Ys4U ^(talk) 13:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Gordon Brown seems to be blaming global warming: "Obviously like every advanced industrial country we're coming to terms with some of the issues surrounding climate change." BBC News. That's a pretty bold claim and it merits a mention. Mattmm 19:45, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Well of course he is. Its the easiest way to divert blame from his own pathetic government to something that "beyond their control". Bunch of fucking wankers, like everyone who voted for them.

FREE LIFE!!!!!!!

Check the text

Someone needs to check for duplication. The sentence about the number of homeless appears twice, but I'm not sure which to delete. Digifiend 07:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

I've deleted it from the Hull section and left it in the introduction, although I think this could be improved. Also I'm slightly dubious about the statistic of 17,000 homeless in Hull - I think this needs a citation to back it up. MartinBrook t 21:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Revised down to 6,500: [1] - MPF 00:48, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

July

As there is continuing floods now in July, should these be included here? If so, shouldn't this be renamed "Summer 2007 United Kingdom floods"

Torrential rain sweeps across UK (an example of a news report.

Simply south 18:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Agreed, have moved the page to it's new title. Just needs the details on this weeks events added. Yorkshiresky 19:23, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Why is it Summer 2007 United Kingdom floods? Category:Floods in the United Kingdom doesn't have any other UK floods from this year, so shouldn't it just be 2007 United Kingdom floods. Keep in mind that the title can often be confusing at first for other users since tropical areas don't have the four seasons and they're reversed in the southern hemisphere (see WP:SEASON). 17Drew 05:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

There seems clear consensus for this move from yourself, myself, and another user below with no objecting views. I will move this now - PocklingtonDan (talk) 20:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Map of Floods?

Has anyone seen a map showing the scale of the floods with the original course of the rivers and the extent of flooding superimposed over the top? I think something like that would make a great addition to this article. Vance2038 18:51, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

There are maps showing the river courses and the affected counties on the BBC site but not seen any showing the extent that rivers have burst their banks yet. Worth keeping an eye on the media (One of the broadsheets had a good map of flood areas in a special feature section after the 03 floods) and/or the Environment Agency who are responsible for issuing the flood warnings, maintaining flood defences, etc... - JVG 19:06, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Biggest RAF peacetime operation?

At present we have "The RAF said it is carrying out its biggest ever peacetime operation, with six Sea King helicopters rescuing up to 120 people." and this is cited at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6911226.stm. Whilst I absolutely accept that the BBC is a credible source I suspect that this remark has been taken out of context. It might be that the RAF are running their biggest ever search and rescue peacetime operation (yes, I know this is "original research" on my part), but compared to the RAF airlift during the Berlin Blockade, six Sea Kings pales into insignificance. I can find several other examples of bigger peacetime operations if people don't like the Berlin airlift one. Greenshed 19:22, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree. Only this BBC article states that it is "biggest ever peacetime operation", while all other sources describe it as "biggest ever peacetime rescue operation". So I added reference to search and rescue nature of this operation and some references to credible sources. Ilvil 19:55, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

There's a heat wave in Europe too, and this is just as notable as the floods

There actually have been more deaths across Europe from the heat and similar effects such as crop damage, so why is this not also on the main page?--Trustbother 08:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Because the article is awful. The correct place for this discussion is WP:ITN/C. Capuchin 08:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

That appears to be be old news anyway from the article. 2007 Bulgarian Heat wave is more recent but the article isn't that great either Nil Einne 13:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Title

I suggest that the page is moved to the simpler, and more normal, 2007 United Kingdom floods. There is no other article to disambiguate from. Bridgeplayer 16:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree - PocklingtonDan (talk) 19:10, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Have Wales and Scotland been affected at all, should it be 2007 England floods? - ARC Gritt^TALK 20:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Wales has, with flash flooding and with the floods in Barry last week, plus near Welshpool more recently. Not heard of anything in Scotland though. - JVG 20:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Glasgow was affected in one of the June floods (already mentioned in the article) - MPF 00:34, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Heading

I have made a more simpler heading dividing the current event up with the June one, makes more simpler reading I think --88.109.242.121 18:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

What is Worst?

There are various references in the article to the "worst flooding" or "worst effected". It seems to me that this is just a POV unless there is a reference to some sort of official source for such a statement. For example, in the Oxfordshire section what is the basis for saying that the flooding in Abingdon was worse than that in, say, Banbury or Witney?

By the way, the rivers Thames and Cherwell do not meet in Abingdon, that is the Thames and the Ock. The Cherwell joins the Thames at Oxford. 86.138.40.220 22:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Cost of damage

Article currently says "Damage to business and property is estimated to be over £2 billion" - an insurance expert interviewed on Radio 4 Today programme (24 July) said £5 billion; if that can be found on the Beeb website, it should be added - MPF 00:32, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Bedfordshire/Luton

Bedfordshire and Luton (ceremonially Bedfordshire) are depicted blue on the map, and this is true. But there is no information. I don't know enough about it except the rivers Great Ouse and Lea (Bedford and Luton respectively) burst their banks. I'm not entirely sure about the Great Ouse, but the Lea's flood plains at some point were approximately 1 ft deep. This was on 20/07/07.

86.154.68.200 14:29, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

>>>Yes there is mention of it - it's under the Cambridgeshire listing on the page here 88.109.232.214 14:51, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Er, two things.

Firstly, that link doesn't mention Bedfordshire/Luton (or am I wrong)?. Does anybody know for a link to a source that says "Beds flooded on/prior to July 24"?

Secondly, the info on the floodpage for Cambridgeshire doesn't say Cambridgeshire flooded, it says they're preparing for floods: different thing. Even worse, when I try to find a link that says "Cambridgeshire flooded" or some such, the only thing I can find is this. And because the link isn't stable (same URL gives different results, depending on which day you click on it), I can't use it as a source. So the question I have to ask is "Does anybody have a usable source that says anything in Cambridgeshire got flooded on/prior to July 24"? Because otherwise, I'm going to have to take it off the "was damaged by July 24th" map.

Kind regards, Anameofmyveryown 04:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Well for the first one you mentioned...I am in Luton and yes they flooded prior to July 24.

For the second one mentioned...the the Great Ouse isn't only in Cambridgeshire. 81.132.68.201 20:37, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for that, 81.132.68.201, but you're not answering the question I asked. I didn't ask if Bedfordshire was affected. I asked if anybody could point to a usable citation that said Bedfordshire was affected. I looked for cites, found them and added them to the article, and ditto for Cambridgeshire. If you or anybody else have any other citable sources, please add them to the article. Anameofmyveryown 15:43, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Oxford images

I've a chunk of photos (pushing towards 300 just now) of flooding in and around Oxford here; if any of them would be any use to the article, let me know and I'll reupload them to Commons. Shimgray | talk | 22:18, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Gloscityflood07.jpg

Image:Gloscityflood07.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:30, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

The twins

There's some debate over whether the premature twins who died in Tewkesbury/Cheltenham were flood victims or not.

• The BBC report is headlined "Twins die in rescue bid" and leaves you to draw your own conclusions - but the report doesn't flat-out say they were flood victims.
• The Gloucestershire Police statement points out that the helicopter(s?) got the babies to the hospital quicker than an ambulance would have done and leaves you to draw your own conclusions - but the report doesn't flat-out say the flood did not cause the premature labour, doesn't flat-out say that the time-from-999-call-to-hospital-arrival (the crucial benchmark) was any more/less than it would have been if there was no flooding, and doesn't flat-out say whether the equipment onboard the helicopter was equivalent to that onboard an ambulance.

So I'm faced with two ambiguous contradictory sources and I'm tearing my hair out over what to do. Given the conflicting reports, I've moved the twins to "Conflicting reports" and will downcount the death toll accordingly. If anybody else can come up with a source (that isn't a blog!) that says flat-out that they were flood victims, please feel free to move them back. But, at the risk of sounding sentimental, I'd really rather not take the responsibility for that decision. For me, this started off as an exercise in Wikipedia copyediting, but now I'm trying to work out which column to put dead children in. And I'm trying to do it dispassionately, and find a clear statement from a reputable source, like a good wikieditor should, and all the rest. But it's a deeply distressing exercise.

Kind regards, Anameofmyveryown 01:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

This sensitive and personal information does not belong to the wikipedia because Wikipedia is not memorial. See this discussed here. (Igny 02:09, 26 July 2007 (UTC))

Definite, definite agreement. Thank you Igny. Kind regards, Anameofmyveryown 02:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Meteorological background

The Meteorological background section needs a mention of La Niña and the changed line of the jet stream, as mentioned on the BBC pages. --Concrete Cowboy 16:45, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

RhynCheck Dead Link

A RhynCheck on this page has found 1 Dead Link: ref [17]^ (sect. [3]^). 1 Malformatted link was found and corrected by the RhynCheck. Rhynri 03:38, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Current Event Notice!: This article documents a current event, and as such links may be temporary in nature. Please submit this page to be RhynChecked again when the event is considered complete. You may do so here.

Commons

Images available on Commons: Commons:2007 United Kingdom floods. Man vyi 06:04, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Information Sources

I understand that as a current event most sources will be from the news but I'm sure there are other sources out there.

Relating to the loss of water supply there is a lot of information on the Severn Trent website www.stwater.co.uk which is never referenced here. Additionally does anyone know how to archive the information on the Severn Trent website for reference, as I doubt that information will stay on the front page of even the website at all for long? ZeroRPM 14:42, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

I would use the Wayback Machine on [www.archive.org the Internet Archive]. Putting in the URL www.stwater.co.uk, it looks like they unfortunately haven't been archiving it that frequently the last few months. However, they might still grab a copy while the information is up there (I hope!). In that case, you could use the archived page there as your source. Here's hoping! Skittle 19:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Britain recent rainfall is nothing comparing Mumbai 2005 downpour

If this is situation in rainfall of around 150 mm , then imagine 944 mm of cloud burst in 24 hr during 26-7-2005. Read 2005_Maharashtra_floods. WIN 11:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Archive 1