Talk:2007 San Francisco mayoral election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

My 2 cents

Yeah, I've seen the edit-warring on this title. Everyone chill. Use the talk page to state your arguments for either version and solicit advice from the wider community.--DaveOinSF 06:25, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing in doubt except for the other person's ability to read our MoS -- election articles take the form "Place type election, year", and only "place" is capitalised, except when the type is not a usual adjective but a specific term ("Senate election", for instance); this is just a specific case of the more general rule not to capitalise article titles except when they would be title in normal text. This is a non-issue. —Nightst a llion (?) 15:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree that the current capitalization scheme is correct. However, I'm only asking that this be dished out on the talk page and not as an edit war.--DaveOinSF 16:20, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Treaty

I would like to have the link to a treaty that is under way that involves this article so then the community can see the rules set by each user and make sure that no rule is broken by one of the users. This treaty is pending as of January 17, 2007 User:Gndawydiak/Treaty for Gndawydiak and Nightstallion --Gndawydiak 23:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.examiner.com/blogs/sf_next_mayor
Triggered by (?<=[/@.])examiner\.com(?:[:/?\x{23}]|$) on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 18:32, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]