Talk:2007 Newfoundland and Labrador general election

Canada: Newfoundland & Labrador / Governments / Politics Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Newfoundland and Labrador.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Untitled

Is anyone else concerned that there are results for an election that hasn't occurred yet? Amalas =^_^= 19:35, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I reference these:

56th_New_Brunswick_general_election

Ontario_general_election,_2007

Pellaken 01:51, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cite sources?

party names are found on elections newfoundland website - party leaders on party websites - party standings on legislature's website - and election date in many places, including the media's websites.

there is nothing to cite

There were by elections and the tories won all of them.

The Liberals won Humber Valley.

This is an old list of districts. A new redistribution will be in effect for the coming election. Some of the listed "candidates" aren't even running again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.105.61.109 (talk) 02:55, August 26, 2007 (UTC)

candidates

http://www.elections.gov.nl.ca/elections/Election_2007/nominations.asp#0 - the official list - a good resoruce 74.14.23.192 04:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Death

How would we deal with the death when it comes to the results? Should we edit it in with a note that the election occured at a different date? I do not like this option personally. We could do something similar to what they did in the alberta 2007 page RE: a recount. but that also seems not right to me. My preference is to list the results for that riding in a different place. like this:

RESULTS

riding - results results results

blah blah blah

SPECIAL ELECTION

riding - results results results

or something Nickjbor 07:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow

I'm not exactly a Danny Williams fan, but this is an impressive majority.--Cloveious 02:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any turnout figures available? Bondegezou 15:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CBC Newsworld said just minutes ago that it was just over 61%, but it won't be a firm total until the differed election is complete --Cloveious 23:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lorraine Michael.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Lorraine Michael.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Newfoundland and Labrador general election, 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031024211506/http://www.liberal.nf.net/ to http://www.liberal.nf.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]