Talk:2007 Navy vs. North Texas football game/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 01:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Pass! Good work!--Dom497 (talk) 18:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Comments

• Infobox picture is under full copyright.--Dom497 (talk) 01:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Update: The image has been deleted.--Dom497 (talk) 21:02, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

• The table needs a ref(s).--Dom497 (talk) 01:39, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

• Ref 2 is dead.--Dom497 (talk) 01:42, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

• "The Midshipmen defense allowed an average of 38.8 points per game." - Ref?--Dom497 (talk) 01:43, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

• "Coming off a bye week with a 1–7 record, the team's sole win was against the Louisiana–Monroe Warhawks." - Ref?--Dom497 (talk) 01:44, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

• "... ranking 107th in the nation in rushing defense." and, " It also ranked 119th in scoring defense..." - Need refs.--Dom497 (talk) 01:46, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

• "The game was scheduled to begin at 3 p.m. Central Time at Fouts Field in Denton, Texas." - Needs a ref.--Dom497 (talk) 01:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. It's too bad about the image; I didn't know it was under full copyright (it was there a long time before I started fiddling with it). I've added a ref for the table (though it looks a little awkward), fixed ref 2, and added refs for the remaining sentences you mentioned, all from sources already included elsewhere in the article. Hopefully that addresses the concerns you've mentioned. Thanks, and let me know if you run into anything else. – Runfellow (talk) 15:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

All done!--Dom497 (talk) 18:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)