Talk:2007 Navy vs. North Texas football game

2007 Navy vs. North Texas football game has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 11, 2013. (Reviewed version).

College football Low‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lead problem

The lead says:

"...the most points scored in a D-IA/FBS [game during regulation time] ... since the NCAA began keeping records in 1937."

This line does not make sense to me without further qualification. The NCAA wasn't divided into Divisions until 1971 (and Division I wasn't divided into I-A and I-AA until a few years after that). I'd correct it, but I'm not sure exactly what the author is trying to say. Was it the highest combined score between two current FBS teams? Highest combined score between two teams considered "major college" at the time? Was it higher than any scores before the alignment into divisions...? Strikehold (talk) 07:59, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2007 Navy vs. North Texas football game/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 01:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Pass! Good work!--Dom497 (talk) 18:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

~~Infobox picture is under full copyright.--Dom497 (talk) 01:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)~~[reply]

Update: The image has been deleted.--Dom497 (talk) 21:02, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The table needs a ref(s).--Dom497 (talk) 01:39, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 2 is dead.--Dom497 (talk) 01:42, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"The Midshipmen defense allowed an average of 38.8 points per game." - Ref?--Dom497 (talk) 01:43, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Coming off a bye week with a 1–7 record, the team's sole win was against the Louisiana–Monroe Warhawks." - Ref?--Dom497 (talk) 01:44, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"... ranking 107th in the nation in rushing defense." and, " It also ranked 119th in scoring defense..." - Need refs.--Dom497 (talk) 01:46, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"The game was scheduled to begin at 3 p.m. Central Time at Fouts Field in Denton, Texas." - Needs a ref.--Dom497 (talk) 01:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. It's too bad about the image; I didn't know it was under full copyright (it was there a long time before I started fiddling with it). I've added a ref for the table (though it looks a little awkward), fixed ref 2, and added refs for the remaining sentences you mentioned, all from sources already included elsewhere in the article. Hopefully that addresses the concerns you've mentioned. Thanks, and let me know if you run into anything else. – Runfellow (talk) 15:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All done!--Dom497 (talk) 18:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]