Jump to content

Talk:2006 United States Senate election in Ohio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Changes by 65.27.226.177

[edit]

I have reverted all changes by 65.27.226.177 on the grounds that (1) his/her only prior edit was to Mike DeWine, on March 13th, which was changed by a later editor; (2) the changes he made are unsupported by any citation; and (3) s/he seems to be overly enamored of a 36-year old challenger to DeWine. I welcome further discussion - and recommend that any edits that border on controversial - such as the who is the leading candidate - cite some source. John Broughton 04:35, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

65.27.226.177 - you're not helping your credibility by deleting the above comment. John Broughton 04:25, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

David R. Smith

[edit]

I believe it is unfair that all candidates in this race have articles except for David R. Smith. PedanticallySpeaking 15:53, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Dayton, Ohio.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Flag of Dayton, Ohio.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:24, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seal of Ohio.svg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Seal of Ohio.svg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:25, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 19 external links on United States Senate election in Ohio, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]