	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Ohio Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Mid-importance).

Schedule

Untitled

Michigan doesn't even warrant a mention in the schedule? =) -TheMile 17:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, oops. Can you tell where my sympathies lie? Though I did use the 2006 UM team page as my template :-) Davidmac2003 17:51, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Game

Being that it has been named by ESPN as the biggest rivalry in sports, and that regardless of who ranks it 'officially' on a greatest rivalry list, it seems to me that there should be either an article or, at the very least, a subsection on this article dedicated to the OSU-Michigan rivalry. After all, an annual meeting with as much history and importance in sports as as this -- not to mention when it is simply referred to The Game -- should get more than a passing mention. Anyhow, I'm going to start working on it...please feel free to add on. Ryecatcher773 18:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Date Format

is there a reason why something other than ISO 8601 format is used for the dates here? LightSpeed (talk) 03:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]