Talk:2006 Macau Grand Prix
Appearance
2006 Macau Grand Prix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 13, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2006 Macau Grand Prix article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2006 Macau Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 22:53, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- I'll take this one. Courcelles (talk) 22:53, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Alright, getting on with it:
- "The other Formula Three series champions featured in the entry list was" champion, since there's only one more name listed.
- "runner-up Roldán Rodríguez, Five Macanese drivers" This is two different sentences, so . not , .
- "but the threat of rain never came" The threat of rain came, the actual rain did not, I presume? Needs a rephrase.
- " and deranged his car's front-right suspension." Deranged? Or damaged?
- "Conway thought about passing Tsukakoshi but decided not to." Thought about? Do we have a source for his thinking? I think you mean something similar but slightly different here.
- IS willing a qualification race really an official F3 victory? Got a source that states that?
- Rodolfo Ávila or Avila? Be consistent.
- "on his first try at overtaking him for third during the twelfth lap and was successful." It's only his first try if he needed a second one...
- "The attrition rate was low with five of the thirty-two entrants finishing the race" Are we missing a "not" here somewhere?
Otherwise looks good. Courcelles (talk) 00:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Courcelles: Many thanks for the review. All of your suggestions have been put into the article. MWright96 (talk) 07:33, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promoted. Courcelles (talk) 16:58, 13 July 2018 (UTC)