Talk:2006 Baseball Hall of Fame balloting

Baseball: Hall of Fame / Negro league baseball Mid‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hall of Fame task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Negro league baseball task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Committee on African-American Baseball

Written recommendations from fans and non-committee members were accepted through October 2005. Of the many . . . 94 who were considered by the screening committee were: [list deleted].

Who narrowed the many recommendations to 94? That is basic information we should try to learn! --02:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Did the Committee on A-A BB win the grant and undertake the 2001–2005 research and writing? Or is CAABB specifically the shared name of two committees appointed by the Hall of Fame to select Negro Leagues finalists and then to select among them, 2005/2006?

If the former, then the CAABB should be the subject of a separate article.

Either way, the 2005/2006 consideration of pre-NeL and Negro Leagues figures should be the subject of a good Main Article. That article should cover:

selection procedures (adequately covered here, except for the point noted above)
three groups of winners, finalists, semifinalists (the outcomes, covered here)
background: how and why the reconsideration at this time 2001–2006 (maybe a MLB initiative rather than a Museum and HOF initiative)
aftermath: what people presume, surmise, and hope(aloud) about the finality of this episode (eg, does this close the books? how does the HOF present these members today?)

P.S. That article would not be "List-class".

P.P.S. It's possible that a ~~good~~ mediocre Main Article is impossible at wikipedia because the published record is too meagre. Still, there should be a ~~mediocre~~ poor Main Article. --P64 (talk) 18:51, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

These seem like good ideas, but I agree that it may be hard to find the necessary sources. Has anyone from the committees written about the process? BRMo (talk) 02:11, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

limited remarks by Dick Clark and Editor S. in the Negro Leagues Committee newsletter, SABR? maybe similar remarks by others who were in position to contribute to a newsletter or be interviewed by a student newspaper?

Why was I optimistic on Sunday? It was raining ...

Evidently I overlooked that wikipedia deprecates resort to contemporary coverage in press releases, newsletters, daily newspaper articles. I have revised the postscript above. --P64 (talk) 15:53, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hall of Fame publications

In "Further reading" I have listed and linked some contemporary Hall of Fame publications from the Internet Archive. Three of them are the institution's overview of its Negro Leagues election history, just before completion of the 2006 cycle, its press release announcing the 17 new members and a transcript of the associated press conference (both February 27).

The transcript includes Fay Vincent's introduction of the 12 committee members, for example: "Rob Ruck is an expert on eastern teams from the Negro Leagues. He's a senior lecturer in history at the University of Pittsburgh. He's authored two books and written several documentaries." --P64 (talk) 13:37, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Baseball Hall of Fame balloting, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051214080041/http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/news/2005/051206.htm to http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/news/2005/051206.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061004134712/http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/news/2006/060221.htm to http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/news/2006/060221.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://baseballhalloffame.org/whats_new/press_releases/pr2000_07_20.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://baseballhalloffame.org/whats_new/press_releases/pr2001_02_19.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/hofers_and_honorees/negro_lg_overview.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/news/2006/060227.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:34, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]