It's an interesting fact, you might actually consider adding it somewhere (e.g., "Craven earned his second (and ultimately last) career win"). But up to you.
Infobox
293 laps, 400.238 mi (644.014 km) — The number of laps is in the lead and infobox, but not in the body of the article. The distance is only in the infobox.
You might consider adding some of the info about broadcasting into the body; most of what is in the infobox is only in the infoxbox. But that's a smaller deal.
one on Friday and two on Saturday — Was the Friday one held in the morning? If so, maybe "one on Friday morning and two on Saturday" since qualifying was held in the afternoon.
Can you briefly explain here what it means? From the link, I get the sense that it means their owners had sufficient points for their drivers to automatically qualify. But (maybe because the rules have changed since 2003), the link says that "In the Cup Series four positions are awarded" when here six qualified, and it says that the spots are given "to the fastest qualifying open teams"; I'm not sure what that means.
Just out of curiosity, is there anything to be gained by having fast laps in post-qualifying practice sessions, or is it just bragging rights and the promise of a good car to race in?
Well, it's usually for teams to fine-tune their cars for the race and to test whether some legal parts would help in improving its performance MWright96(talk)16:53, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Race
Johnson made contact with Marlin, who was sent veering into an outside barrier on the backstretch. A cut tire disabled the steering on Marlin's vehicle on the run to turn one, and he crashed against a wall. — I'm a bit confused here. So first Marlin got hit by Johnson, sending him into a barrier, and then a cut tire on his car disabled his steering, causing him to bounce from the barrier into a wall? Also, "on the run" is a big jargony.
as Craven's car got loose because he could not remove his hands from the steering wheel and drive towards the barrier — Why would he want to drive towards the barrier?
As Busch perceived this as the ideal situation, he had no plan for taking the victory — Why was that ideal for him? And what does it mean that he had no plan?
Craven is first mentioned around lap 242, when he was in fourth place. Given that he won (and started pretty far back), perhaps some of his progression should be included?
Craven ... asked his crew who had won the race. Leaving turn two, he glanced to his left to read the scoring pylon informing drivers and spectators of the finishing positions, and learnt he had succeed. — So his crew didn't tell him?
Thanks, MWright96. Passing now. There's a comment above that you might consider, but certainly nothing to hold up the nomination. Again, feel free to drop me a line if you take this to FAC. --Usernameunique (talk) 20:03, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]