Jump to content

Talk:2003 Carolina Dodge Dealers 400

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2003 Carolina Dodge Dealers 400. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2003 Carolina Dodge Dealers 400/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Usernameunique (talk · contribs) 12:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Lead

  • Ricky Craven ... started from the 32nd position — The chart below says 31st.
  • It was Craven's ... final win of his career — Not mentioned in the body.
Infobox
Background
Practice and qualifying
  • one on Friday and two on Saturday — Was the Friday one held in the morning? If so, maybe "one on Friday morning and two on Saturday" since qualifying was held in the afternoon.
  • used provisionals to enter the race — What does this mean?
    • Added a wikilink to the term MWright96 (talk) 16:53, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Can you briefly explain here what it means? From the link, I get the sense that it means their owners had sufficient points for their drivers to automatically qualify. But (maybe because the rules have changed since 2003), the link says that "In the Cup Series four positions are awarded" when here six qualified, and it says that the spots are given "to the fastest qualifying open teams"; I'm not sure what that means.
  • Just out of curiosity, is there anything to be gained by having fast laps in post-qualifying practice sessions, or is it just bragging rights and the promise of a good car to race in?
Race
  • Johnson made contact with Marlin, who was sent veering into an outside barrier on the backstretch. A cut tire disabled the steering on Marlin's vehicle on the run to turn one, and he crashed against a wall. — I'm a bit confused here. So first Marlin got hit by Johnson, sending him into a barrier, and then a cut tire on his car disabled his steering, causing him to bounce from the barrier into a wall? Also, "on the run" is a big jargony.
  • The latter three continued driving — What about the former three?
  • Earnhardt remained the leader from Nadeau and Spencer at the restart on lap 40 — Not sure what "from Nadeau and Spencer" means here.
  • on the circuit as he remained on the same lap as the leader — Not sure you need this.
  • Throughout the article there seems to be some inconsistency between front stretch/frontstretch/back stretch/backstretch
  • Also some inconsistency between "pit road," "the pit road," and "pit lane." Not a problem if they're properly understood as synonyms, however.
  • On lap 289, Craven began to gain on Busch — But somewhere around 278, didn't Busch's spotter tell him that Craven was already gaining?
  • as Craven's car got loose because he could not remove his hands from the steering wheel and drive towards the barrier — Why would he want to drive towards the barrier?
  • As Busch perceived this as the ideal situation, he had no plan for taking the victory — Why was that ideal for him? And what does it mean that he had no plan?
  • Craven is first mentioned around lap 242, when he was in fourth place. Given that he won (and started pretty far back), perhaps some of his progression should be included?
Post-race
  • Craven ... asked his crew who had won the race. Leaving turn two, he glanced to his left to read the scoring pylon informing drivers and spectators of the finishing positions, and learnt he had succeed. — So his crew didn't tell him?

Overall

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:22, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(
)

Improved to Good Article status by MWright96 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:40, 4 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • Hmm, this looks familiar... GA, in time, long enough, sourced, no apparent copyvios, in-line hook citations check out, QPQ done. Strong preference for ALT0. MWright96, I've removed the "joint-" from "joint-closest finish"; "joint" might be appropriate if the hook were written in the present tense, but since the hook is written in the past tense—and the tie only happened later—it is not needed here. --Usernameunique (talk) 06:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Usernameunique, regrettably, you are not an eligible reviewer for this nomination, since you were the reviewer at GAN per WP:DYKSG#H2: You're not allowed to approve your own hook or article, nor may you review an article if it's a recently listed Good Article that you either nominated or reviewed for GA (though you can still nominate it for DYK). The idea is that a new reviewer might spot something that the original reviewer might have overlooked in their review (and indeed this has happened in the past). So we're going to need a fresh review by someone not involved with the GA review. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I will do a full review, due to the need for an independent reviewer
  • ☑Y Article is long enough (20338 characters), is a GA, nominated in time (GA on 9 April, nominated on 12 April) and article is within policy
  • ☑Y ALT0 is short enough, interesting, and well cited. ALT1 is far less interesting in my opinion, so I suggest we use ALT0
  • ☑Y QPQ done
  • Overall, this nomination passes, congratulations. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:30, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2003_Carolina_Dodge_Dealers_400&oldid=1196377189"