Jump to content

Talk:2002 Bou'in-Zahra earthquake/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Here is some initial stuff:

*Ref # 2 doesn't have an author and such. I understand that it says "CNN", but then you have to change the type of "cite web" template.

*There are several redlinks in this article. You should probably resolve them by either creating the article, conducting a more of an in-depth search for them, or just removing the link altogether. But I encourage creating the article most.

  • Within Qazvin Province, where the earthquake occurred, earthquakes happen more infrequently than the national average, though when they do, the Arabian tectonic plate, pushed northward by the African plate, collides with the Eurasian plate, giving these seismic occurrences more force.
    • Could you please make this more flowing?
    • Changed to "Within Qazvin Province, where the earthquake occurred, earthquakes happen more infrequently than the national average.[3] However, when they do, the Arabian plate, pushed northward by the African plate, collides with the Eurasian plate, giving these earthquakes more force." I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 20:37, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • However, structures built in accordance with the Iranian code of practice for seismic-resistant design survived much better.
    • What is this supposed to mean? Perhaps I'm playing a little dumb, but still I don't know the Iranian code of practice for seismic-resistant design (and I doubt you do either. :)) Perhaps you could provide a link or create an article on this?

~~Meldshal42 (talk) 15:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting

[edit]

In doing copyediting on request, I've come across two apparently contradictory sentences. I have no idea what this article is about, thank goodness I don't need to know in order to copyedit, but I thought one of the main article writers/reviewers should look at these two sentences from two separate sections and tell me how they don't contradict:

  1. The Qazvin region was hit by an even stronger earthquake in 1963, killing 12,200 (Background and Tectonics)
  2. The event also damaged the historical Kharaqan tomb towers, in a good state of preservation prior to the earthquake, which suggests that the quake was the most powerful in the region for approximately 900 years (Damage and Casualties)

Both seem to be referring to Qazvin. Which is right? What am I missing? Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:14, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Changed to "The event also damaged the historical Kharaqan tomb towers, in a good state of preservation prior to the earthquake, which suggests that the quake was one of the most powerful in the immediate region for approximately 900 years." --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 04:09, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Found another one, and again, this could be due to my contextual ignorance:

  1. Residents in the village of Changureh resorted to throwing stones at the car of a government minister (lead paragraph), contradicts
  2. Residents of Avaj threw stones at Interior Minister Abdolvahed Mousavi-Lari's car in anger at the government's delay in providing relief (Public Anger section)
Is it Changureh or Avaj? Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:44, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Avaj. While I've had several sources say it was both, the general scientificb concensus seems, rather then when I wrote the intro, that it was Avaj. Hell, I once though that they were the same place! but I understand now they aren't. --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 04:09, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]