Talk:19 October 2024 Beit Lahia attacks
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 19 October 2024 Beit Lahia attacks article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of 19 October 2024 Beit Lahia attacks be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
massacre?
[edit]hamas calls it a massacre and suddenly we take that as a source? seems silly. its also an allegation. CViB (talk) 00:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- "Attack" and "strike" appear to be more commonly used by reliable sources. Not sure what you mean by "allegation" though. Nythar (💬-🍀) 00:28, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- no credible source describes it as a "massacre". only "source" one doing so is Hamas CViB (talk) 02:44, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Here are uses of the word 'massacre'- not just when quoting the government of Gaza (Hamas political wing)- in English-language news from countries, intl. orgs, and accepted major media outlets I could find. This is just concerning its usage- ignoring the factual basis for the application of the word
- this is a recent event, so more may come (and will try to update later)
- Governments and Intl. Organizations:
- Egypt (Egypt Today): [1]
- Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC): [2]
- Palestinian Authority (Palestinian News & Info Agency): [3]
- Kuwait (Kuwait News Agency): [4]
- Media:
- Mason7512 (talk) 21:39, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Mason7512 none of those are credible sources. none of them. those are pro-arab anti-israeli sources. 138.255.255.35 (talk) 21:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- First, Al Jeezera is considered credible on Wikipedia (see WP:ALJAZEERA).
- Second, the Governments and International Organization are not included because they are or are not credible, but to establish usage and international perception.
- Third, what do you mean 'pro-arab'? they are all arab countries and arab outlets, yes. No entity is void of bias, and bias does not automatically exclude their inclusion/consideration on Wikipedia (see WP:BIASED and WP:ALLOWEDBIAS which, again, apply to sources, which is not what I am recommending the governments/orgs be) Mason7512 (talk) 22:17, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Mason7512 glad the title was changed. those arab sources you posted are the same sources who celebrates oct 7 as a "victory for Palestinian people" 138.255.255.6 (talk) 17:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- There was no reason beyond spite for this reply. Wikipedia is not a forum to discuss your opinions or settle grievances with other users, please do not abuse talk pages like this.
- And again, these were not sources, aside from the Al Jazeera which is considered reliable on Wikipedia, they were just all the instances I could find at the time of governments using the word massacre. I never even took a position on supporting or not supporting the title, I was just gathering relevant content for this discussion to provide sufficient context of an opposing argument. Mason7512 (talk) 19:32, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- It literally says there that Al Jazira is biased on this very topic... 213.57.168.191 (talk) 06:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Mason7512 glad the title was changed. those arab sources you posted are the same sources who celebrates oct 7 as a "victory for Palestinian people" 138.255.255.6 (talk) 17:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Mason7512 none of those are credible sources. none of them. those are pro-arab anti-israeli sources. 138.255.255.35 (talk) 21:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class Palestine-related articles
- Low-importance Palestine-related articles
- WikiProject Palestine articles
- C-Class Israel-related articles
- Low-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
- Middle Eastern military history task force articles
- C-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- C-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles
- C-Class Human rights articles
- Low-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in the Palestinian territories