Jump to content

Talk:1986 Indianapolis 500

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disputed

[edit]

I believe that the results on this page are incorrect. For example, I believe that Bettenhausen finished 11th, not Parsons. I have not changed the article as I don't believe that I have all the necessary data at this time. --Brian G 14:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections

[edit]

This results page is quite inaccurate. Not just Parsons, but I spot several others off the top of my head. Here is a link listing proper results. I would fix it, but I am short on time right now. http://www.geocities.com/johnsonindy500/indy500/500boxscores/500box86.html Doctorindy 17:33, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1986 Indianapolis 500. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]