Talk:1976 Manfredonia accidental release of arsenic

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge

@AccidentRecorder: Can you explain how this explosion article is wp:notable as its own article separate from Manfredonia? I know I can't. Nasa-verve (talk) 16:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised you are unfamiliar with WP:N when you refer to the guideline (it's not policy) as rationale for your edits. I quote from line 1 of WP:GNG: "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list". As I said, you seem to confuse notability for a stub. Notability does not refer to the present state of an article, but its potential. AccidentRecorder (talk) 08:18, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

University of Edinburgh assignment - Global Health Challenges Pg Online

Dear all, this is just to flag up that several students on the Global Health Challenges Pg Online course will be researching and improving (in groups) approximately seven stub articles related to WikiProject Disaster management this month. Namely:

So if you see a flurry of activity on these pages in the coming days then don't worry it is not an attack it is just new student editors trying to help improve and expand these articles using their research. If possible please avoid reverts and provide constructive criticism to help the students learn where they be going wrong whether it is wording, style guidelines or formatting or the types of sources being used etc. Hopefully any issues should be minor in natuure but any problems or questions, please ask! Thanks, Stinglehammer Stinglehammer (talk) 17:17, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]