Talk:1973 Brooklyn hostage crisis/GA1

GA Review

Passed. ~ Argenti Aertheri^(Chat?) 03:41, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Argenti Aertheri (talk · contribs) 03:19, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Last updated at 2023-10-01 18:28:18 by Sawol

See what the criteria are and what they are not

1) Well-written

1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

1b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

2) Verifiable with no original research

2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

2c) it contains no original research

2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism

3) Broad in its coverage

3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

4) Neutral:

4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each

5) Stable:

5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio

6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Overall:

Comments

Are images available?
Needs copy editing. I've fixed the minor issues, but it needs a through going over.
"The defense contended that they held up the store to acquire weapons for self-defense because they feared attacks by their rivals, the Black Muslims." - reword to put that into context in a quote

I'm going to put this on hold for a week (Wednesday). @AdoTang: & @Epicgenius:, you've both put a lot of work into this, so maybe you can get it up to GA standards in a week. I've certainly seen weirder things happen!

Hey, thanks for reviewing this.

Unfortunately, just about every single photo of the incident was taken by The New York Times, which I believe we can't use. I might try to add a map pinpointing where the incident occurred, though I don't know how to work with maps.
I'll give the article a look-over, but I thought it was pretty okay last time I checked.
I'll see what I can do.

AdoTang (talk) 16:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Argenti Aertheri: Expanded the article and touched upon some stuff you mentioned. I plan to add a map pinpointing the location soon if I can. Any other pointers? AdoTang (talk) 03:16, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is unfortunate about the images, I just spent a bit playing with maps though. You can stick this directly in the info box, or change it to say whatever you want. It's using Template:Maplink (failed attempted removed, see next) ~ Argenti Aertheri^(Chat?) 03:59, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ETA: of course it won't preview properly, I'll get a copy working in my sandbox ~ Argenti Aertheri^(Chat?)

I still think it needs some copy editing, but now that I understand what it's trying to say I can take care of that myself. Looks like you've fixed most everything else, and images aren't required in order to pass, so it'll likely be good to go tomorrow. I'm done for the night though, I'll CE it probably late tomorrow and then pass it. ~ Argenti Aertheri^(Chat?) 04:20, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AdoTang: I just finished a thorough copy edit, please make sure everything still looks good to you. If so, do you want me to add a map before I pass it? ~ Argenti Aertheri^(Chat?) 01:36, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Once I pass this I'm going to see if I can find a link directly to that last citation. I had marked it a bad link because it redirects to the site's homepage. ~ Argenti Aertheri^(Chat?) 03:38, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.