Talk:1970–1975 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone seasons
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Dead link
[edit]During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.acn.net.au/articles/naturaldisasters/
- In 1970–75 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone seasons on 2011-05-25 04:10:37, 404 Not Found
- In 1970–75 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone seasons on 2011-06-06 14:46:11, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 14:46, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Whatever the www.acn.net.au site was, it seems to have been shut down. The home page still exists, but it is just an empty placeholder, and sub-pages automatically get redirected to the home page. Maybe the site owner stopped paying the hosting fee or just got tired of maintaining it. — QuicksilverT @ 17:14, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Proposed merge with 1974-75 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone season
[edit]The 1974–75 article is an orphaned article and would be helpful to fill in the missing information in the 1970–75 article. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:53, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- While i respect and understand the reasoning behind the proposal, I feel that niether article should exist with the data going into the 3 season pages for each year. I notice with 74-75 that the Aus and SWIO are set up so its just a case of setting the SPAC one up and removing any data from this article and the 74-75 one and redirecting them.Jason Rees (talk) 02:26, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- I've checked and found that the other three year links are currently redirects. (See here, here and here) Therefore, I see no need for only this one to have a standalone article. Perhaps the Australian and the South-West Indian Ocean pages need to be merged as well, but that's for another nom. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
I would oppose the nom, since we are trying to split the SHEM seasons into the 3 basins from these sort of articles. Off the top of my head, i believe this is done through the 80s and it just needs the 70s split off.Jason Rees (talk) 13:05, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- I see. If that is the case, I guess it would help, considering the size. I'll check the other articles here. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:13, 13 July 2014 (UTC)