Talk:1962 FA Charity Shield/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 08:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Shall be reviewing this article as part of the GAN Backlog Drive of April to May 2020. MWright96 (talk) 08:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox
[edit]- The title of the article should be included at the top of the infobox
Lead
[edit]- "and played between" - and was played
- "and late goals from John White and Terry Medwin sandwiched a Roy Stephenson consolation goal for Ipswich." - try not to use the word "sandwiched"
Pre-match
[edit]- Add a wikilink to the Second Division to the relevant article
- "Ipswich were managed by former Tottenham played" - player
- "and had beaten the London club" - how about defeated for variety?
- "Tottenham Hotspur had beaten Burnley 3–1 at Wembley" - {{xt|[[Wembley Stadium (1923)|Wembley Stadium}}
- "where they defeated a Football Association representative XI 3–2." - think you want to clarify that the XI was a team for the uninformed
Summary
[edit]- "and Smith struck to double Tottenham's lead," - struck the ball
- Done. Not as suggested, but tightened. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- What was Carberry's injury?
- It was apparently an ankle injury but I have no contemporaneous sources for that. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
References
[edit]- Reference 3 is dead and will need to be archived
- IABot smashed it. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to respond/query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 09:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- MWright96 addressed your concerns I hope. Responses all inline above. Thanks for the great review. Let me know if there's anything else I can do. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: I have nothing more to raise in this review. I will promoting the article to GA class. MWright96 (talk)
- MWright96 addressed your concerns I hope. Responses all inline above. Thanks for the great review. Let me know if there's anything else I can do. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)