Talk:1962 FA Charity Shield

1962 FA Charity Shield has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 29, 2020. (Reviewed version).

A fact from 1962 FA Charity Shield appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 June 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Tottenham Hotspur defeated Ipswich Town 5–1 in the 1962 FA Charity Shield played at Portman Road in Ipswich?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/June.

Wikipedia

Football: England / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Sources

The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 15:55, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1962 FA Charity Shield/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 08:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shall be reviewing this article as part of the GAN Backlog Drive of April to May 2020. MWright96 (talk) 08:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Infobox

The title of the article should be included at the top of the infobox
Done. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

"and played between" - and was played
Done. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"and late goals from John White and Terry Medwin sandwiched a Roy Stephenson consolation goal for Ipswich." - try not to use the word "sandwiched"
Done. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-match

Add a wikilink to the Second Division to the relevant article
Done. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Ipswich were managed by former Tottenham played" - player
Done. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"and had beaten the London club" - how about defeated for variety?
Done. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Tottenham Hotspur had beaten Burnley 3–1 at Wembley" - {{xt|[[Wembley Stadium (1923)|Wembley Stadium}}
Done. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"where they defeated a Football Association representative XI 3–2." - think you want to clarify that the XI was a team for the uninformed
Done. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Summary

"and Smith struck to double Tottenham's lead," - struck the ball
Done. Not as suggested, but tightened. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What was Carberry's injury?
It was apparently an ankle injury but I have no contemporaneous sources for that. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

Reference 3 is dead and will need to be archived
IABot smashed it. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to respond/query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 09:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MWright96 addressed your concerns I hope. Responses all inline above. Thanks for the great review. Let me know if there's anything else I can do. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: I have nothing more to raise in this review. I will promoting the article to GA class. MWright96 (talk)