Talk:1946 Windsor–Tecumseh tornado

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

Weather: Thunderstorms / Tornadoes Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tornadoes portal This article is supported by WikiProject Severe weather (assessed as Mid-importance).

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Strength

Now, i believe this was a solid F4 in strength, but is it possible for a tornado with a rating of F4 to have some F5 damage, or to be an F5 "briefly"? Here's an example of the destruction the Windsor Tornado did that the Windsor Star claims to be "marginal F5 damage": http://www.on.ec.gc.ca/canwarn/images/3.jpg. RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 19:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Almost all F5 tornadoes are only an F5 briefly. Often only one or two structures recieve F5 damage, and that is the basis for rating the tornado. I can't remember the source, but I read that on average, only 1% of an F5 tornado's damage path is actual F5 damage.

As for the Windsor Tornado, it was not an F5. Additionally, in the picture above, the house is not swept clean, and looking at the concrete blocks which don't appear to have any mortar on them, the foundation of this structure was not reinforced in the least. Do you have a link to the newspaper article? While they are not an authoritative source on rating tornadoes, it would be nice to see what they have to say. -Running On Brains 17:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1946 Windsor–Tecumseh tornado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030111062912/http://www.on.ec.gc.ca/canwarn/windsor-e.html to http://www.on.ec.gc.ca/canwarn/windsor-e.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality/Accuracy Check

As of this edit, 15:14, 27 December 2022, information in this article is accurate per the given sources/citations. Tornado was officially rated F4 with “marginal” F5 damage mentioned by a cited source. Start Class is appropriate for this article & more citations should be found and added. If there is a question about information accuracy in the future, please begin a talk page message and ping me in the message. Elijahandskip (talk) 15:22, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]