Talk:1920 Xalapa earthquake
Appearance
1920 Xalapa earthquake (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 3 April 2023 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
1920 Xalapa earthquake has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 30, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1920 Xalapa earthquake article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from 1920 Xalapa earthquake appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 November 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:1920 Xalapa earthquake/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Bdonjc (talk · contribs) 06:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Overall, this is a well-written and well-covered article. There were a few spelling and grammatical errors, but I fixed them. Bdonjctalk 04:57, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Rlink2 (talk) 00:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
( )
To T:DYK
- ... that the first scientific study of aftershocks following a destructive earthquake was undertaken after the 1920 Xalapa earthquake? Source: [1]
- Reviewed:
- Comment: QPQ not required since this is my third DYK nomination. Full text can be found on ResearchGate.
Improved to Good Article status by Dora the Axe-plorer (talk). Self-nominated at 01:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: @Dora the Axe-plorer: Good article. Going to approve in good faith due to foreign language sources. Onegreatjoke (talk) 13:10, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- The source says "probably the first aftershock study", but the hook assert this as a known fact. I think we need to tweak the wording in the hook. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:06, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- ALT blurb 1 ... that the first probable scientific study of aftershocks following a destructive earthquake was undertaken after the 1920 Xalapa earthquake?
Categories:
- Old requests for peer review
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class WikiProject Earthquakes articles
- High-importance WikiProject Earthquakes articles
- WikiProject Earthquakes articles
- GA-Class Mexico articles
- Mid-importance Mexico articles
- WikiProject Mexico articles
- GA-Class Disaster management articles
- Mid-importance Disaster management articles