Jump to content

Talk:1896 St. Louis–East St. Louis tornado

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tornado Chart

[edit]

What is up with the chart? It makes no sense in the context of this article. 137.48.134.32 20:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


this was one of the tornados that wont be forgoten

i believe the chart is for the outbreak, else i have no idea why it is there. the tornado outbreak of which this was but 1 tornado, had 14 confrimed and at those listed levels..Childhoodtrauma 00:24, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The chart is extremely useful, and is WP:SEVERE standard. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 19:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the chart is for the outbreak; apparently the outbreak of the 27th. The article needs expanding on the outbreak as well as the STL tornado itself. Evolauxia (talk) 00:25, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction

[edit]

The 1927 tornado was not the second costliest tornado on record, Lubbock was the second costliest. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 19:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Normalizing, or standardizing, tornado events for changes in inflation and wealth, it is the second costliest, as seen here which is from Brooks and Doswell, 2001 (which is sourced in the article for the claim of most damaging, which in unadjusted numbers would go to OKC 1999 and Lubbock somewhat down the list). Evolauxia (talk) 00:28, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rename this article?

[edit]

I was thinking that this article should be renamed to something like May 1896 tornado outbreak sequence. This St. Louis event was was just one of (although the worst) several outbreaks over a two week period. I don't know that it makes sense to have one article for each outbreak, considering the current standards, or having one article for the other four outbreaks, and leaving this one by itself. In addition, this article already mentions the other tornadoes of May, 1896.

Here are the details of the outbreaks according to the main outbreak page. Thoughts?

5/15: 85 deaths 5/17: 25 deaths 5/24-25: 79 deaths This one: 305 deaths

Gopher backer (talk) 01:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To comply with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events), I changed the article name: tornado should be in lower case. This doesn't address any of the other issues you may have mentioned above. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:33, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

afterwards

[edit]

I have two photo heavy books on this tornado system that were in print at the time, one of which is listed as a reference/further reading. one of the two (and i don't remember if it was the already referenced one or not) has some information about the aftermath in st. louis. from memory it includes people in the south sicde of the city (the poor/imigreant section at that time) feeling they were being ignored and the residents going as far as to burn the mayor of the city in effigy. would we want to consider adding sourced material about some of the long term after effects? currently there is none at all other than death tolls. and if we start to enter it, I'm not sure if the one source i have would represent enough information (i do not believe, for example, it mentions the illinois side after issues at all)Childhoodtrauma (talk) 16:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely! Some information is better than nothing. Gopher backer (talk) 16:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 23:57, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 1896 St. Louis–East St. Louis tornado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1896 St. Louis–East St. Louis tornado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1896 St. Louis–East St. Louis tornado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:19, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:1896_St._Louis–East_St._Louis_tornado&oldid=1195866716"