Talk:102nd Infantry Regiment (United States)

Military history: National / North America / United States / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Infobox- I've revised and pared back the date entry in the info box. Per the Wikipedia Manual of Style, the Infobox is to "to summarize key facts that appear in the article. The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose". With military units, there are usually numerous dates relevant to the unit's history. Most unit articles generally only use the infobox to list the date the unit was created (or constituted, etc.) in its original form and also any dates it was inactivated. I concur with user:Hobbamock that the various dates need to be made clear, but the body of the article is the appropriate location for this sort of longer explanation. Ocalafla (talk) 17:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]